JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) vs AIKO-A465-MAH54Db 9 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) vs AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db

Q: Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) or AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db?

According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) has higher module efficiency (23.52% vs 23.30%); AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

Q: What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) and AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db?

Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) has a module efficiency of 23.52%, while AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db is 23.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

Q: What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) use vs AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db?

Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) uses TOPCon cells; AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

Q: What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) and AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db?

Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) has a 30 years power warranty; AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W)

470 Wp 23.52 % TOPCon

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

AIKO-A465-MAH54Db

465 Wp 23.30 % Back Contact

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

The verdict

AIKO-A465-MAH54Db leads on the differences that matter

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.030 %/°C better in heat. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 10 differences

How alike are they

9 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical

identical differs

What actually differs

10 of 19 parameters

Parameter JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) AIKO-A465-MAH54Db Difference

Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.260 %/°C 0.030 %/°C better in heat

Open-circuit voltage 36.74 V 41.12 V 4.38 V apart

Short-circuit current 15.86 A 14.29 A 1.57 A apart

Module efficiency 23.52 % 23.30 % 0.22 pp more efficient

Cell technology TOPCon Back Contact TOPCon vs Back Contact

Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.35 %/yr 0.05 %/yr slower

Cell count 96 108 12 cells apart

Voltage at max power 31.17 V 34.68 V 3.51 V apart

Current at max power 15.08 A 13.41 A 1.67 A apart

Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1757x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1757x1134x30 mm

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Cell temperature

JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W)

15,769 kWh

AIKO-A465-MAH54Db

15,723 kWh

Lifetime gap

46 kWh

Output when it is hot

Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees

Scenario JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) AIKO-A465-MAH54Db

Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 470 W 465 W

Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 450 W 447 W

Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 429 W 429 W

Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 409 W 411 W

Full specification

Parameter JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) AIKO-A465-MAH54Db Difference

Power and efficiency

Rated power 470 Wp 465 Wp Effectively the same

Module efficiency 23.52 % 23.30 % +0.22 pp for JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W)

Power density 235.2 Wp/m² 233.4 Wp/m² Effectively the same

Open-circuit voltage 36.74 V 41.12 V 4.38 V apart

Voltage at max power 31.17 V 34.68 V 3.51 V apart

Short-circuit current 15.86 A 14.29 A 1.57 A apart

Current at max power 15.08 A 13.41 A 1.67 A apart

Temperature

Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.260 %/°C +0.030 %/°C for AIKO-A465-MAH54Db

Mechanical

Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1757x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1757x1134x30 mm

Module area 1.998 m² 1.992 m² Effectively the same

Weight 24.0 kg 24.5 kg Effectively the same

Weight per kWp 51.1 kg/kWp 52.7 kg/kWp Effectively the same

Warranty and degradation

Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same

Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same

Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.35 %/yr -0.05 %/yr for AIKO-A465-MAH54Db

Technology

Cell technology TOPCon Back Contact TOPCon vs Back Contact

Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same

Cell count 96 108 12 cells apart

Bifacial No No Same

Against the whole database

14,129 panels

Efficiency

#711 vs #1,057

JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) leads by 346 places

Power density

#707 vs #1,028

JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) leads by 321 places

Heat behaviour

#2,220 vs #515

AIKO-A465-MAH54Db leads by 1,705 places

Weight

#4,417 vs #6,371

JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) leads by 1,954 places

Warranty

#21 vs #21

Tied - the same position in the database

Overall

#4,407 vs #4,834

JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) leads by 427 places

More useful comparisons

Open the full database

Same series, other bin

Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) vs Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (475W)

One difference: module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) vs Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (465W)

One difference: module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) vs Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (460W)

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) vs Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (455W)

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) vs Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (450W)

4 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A470-MAH54Db

One difference: module efficiency

Written summary

Checking cache...

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) or AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db?

According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470 W) has higher module efficiency (23.52% vs 23.30%); AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) and AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db?

Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470 W) has a module efficiency of 23.52%, while AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db is 23.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) use vs AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db?

Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470 W) uses TOPCon cells; AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) and AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db?

Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470 W) has a 30 years power warranty; AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Compare Jinko Solar and AIKO as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 144 Jinko Solar offers · See 135 AIKO offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.