AIKO-A465-MAH54Db vs JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) 9 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db vs Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W)

Q: Which panel is better: AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db or Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W)?

According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) has higher module efficiency (23.52% vs 23.30%); AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

Q: What is the efficiency of AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db and Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W)?

AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db has a module efficiency of 23.30%, while Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) is 23.52%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

Q: What cell technology does AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db use vs Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W)?

AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db uses Back Contact cells; Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

Q: What is the warranty on AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db and Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W)?

AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

AIKO-A465-MAH54Db

465 Wp 23.30 % Back Contact

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W)

470 Wp 23.52 % TOPCon

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

The verdict

AIKO-A465-MAH54Db leads on the differences that matter

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.030 %/°C better in heat. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 10 differences

How alike are they

9 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical

identical differs

What actually differs

10 of 19 parameters

Parameter AIKO-A465-MAH54Db JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) Difference

Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.290 %/°C 0.030 %/°C better in heat

Open-circuit voltage 41.12 V 36.74 V 4.38 V apart

Short-circuit current 14.29 A 15.86 A 1.57 A apart

Module efficiency 23.30 % 23.52 % 0.22 pp more efficient

Cell technology Back Contact TOPCon Back Contact vs TOPCon

Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.40 %/yr 0.05 %/yr slower

Cell count 108 96 12 cells apart

Voltage at max power 34.68 V 31.17 V 3.51 V apart

Current at max power 13.41 A 15.08 A 1.67 A apart

Dimensions 1757x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 1757x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Cell temperature

AIKO-A465-MAH54Db

15,723 kWh

JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W)

15,769 kWh

Lifetime gap

46 kWh

Output when it is hot

Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees

Scenario AIKO-A465-MAH54Db JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W)

Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 465 W 470 W

Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 447 W 450 W

Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 429 W 429 W

Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 411 W 409 W

Full specification

Parameter AIKO-A465-MAH54Db JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) Difference

Power and efficiency

Rated power 465 Wp 470 Wp Effectively the same

Module efficiency 23.30 % 23.52 % +0.22 pp for JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W)

Power density 233.4 Wp/m² 235.2 Wp/m² Effectively the same

Open-circuit voltage 41.12 V 36.74 V 4.38 V apart

Voltage at max power 34.68 V 31.17 V 3.51 V apart

Short-circuit current 14.29 A 15.86 A 1.57 A apart

Current at max power 13.41 A 15.08 A 1.67 A apart

Temperature

Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.290 %/°C +0.030 %/°C for AIKO-A465-MAH54Db

Mechanical

Dimensions 1757x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 1757x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm

Module area 1.992 m² 1.998 m² Effectively the same

Weight 24.5 kg 24.0 kg Effectively the same

Weight per kWp 52.7 kg/kWp 51.1 kg/kWp Effectively the same

Warranty and degradation

Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same

Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same

Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.40 %/yr -0.05 %/yr for AIKO-A465-MAH54Db

Technology

Cell technology Back Contact TOPCon Back Contact vs TOPCon

Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same

Cell count 108 96 12 cells apart

Bifacial No No Same

Against the whole database

14,129 panels

Efficiency

#1,057 vs #711

JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) leads by 346 places

Power density

#1,028 vs #707

JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) leads by 321 places

Heat behaviour

#515 vs #2,220

AIKO-A465-MAH54Db leads by 1,705 places

Weight

#6,371 vs #4,417

JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) leads by 1,954 places

Warranty

#21 vs #21

Tied - the same position in the database

Overall

#4,834 vs #4,407

JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) leads by 427 places

More useful comparisons

Open the full database

Same series, other bin

AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A470-MAH54Db

One difference: module efficiency

Same series, other bin

AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A460-MAH54Db

One difference: module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) vs Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (475W)

One difference: module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) vs Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (465W)

One difference: module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) vs Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (460W)

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W) vs Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (455W)

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Written summary

Checking cache...

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db or Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W)?

According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470 W) has higher module efficiency (23.52% vs 23.30%); AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

What is the efficiency of AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db and Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W)?

AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db has a module efficiency of 23.30%, while Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470 W) is 23.52%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

What cell technology does AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db use vs Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W)?

AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db uses Back Contact cells; Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470 W) uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

What is the warranty on AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db and Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470W)?

AIKO AIKO-A465-MAH54Db has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM450-475N-48HL4M-DB-Z2-EN (470 W) has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Compare AIKO and Jinko Solar as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 137 AIKO offers · See 145 Jinko Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.