Skip to main content
JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) (455W) vs JKM460N-54HL4R-(V) 17 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) (455W) vs Jinko Solar JKM460N-54HL4R-(V)

Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) (455W)
JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) (455W)
455 Wp 22.77 % N-type
VS
JKM460N-54HL4R-(V)
460 Wp 23.02 % TOPCon
The verdict

JKM460N-54HL4R-(V) leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.25 pp more efficient. 17 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 2 differences
How alike are they
17 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

2 of 19 parameters
Parameter JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) (455W) JKM460N-54HL4R-(V) Difference
Module efficiency 22.77 % 23.02 % 0.25 pp more efficient
Cell technology N-type TOPCon N-type vs TOPCon
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) (455W)
15,266 kWh
JKM460N-54HL4R-(V)
15,434 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) (455W) JKM460N-54HL4R-(V)
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 455 W 460 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 435 W 440 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 415 W 420 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 396 W 400 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) (455W) JKM460N-54HL4R-(V) Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 455 Wp 460 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 22.77 % 23.02 % +0.25 pp for JKM460N-54HL4R-(V)
Power density 227.7 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 39.98 V 40.17 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 33.41 V 33.60 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.07 A 14.14 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.62 A 13.69 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 1.998 m² 1.998 m² Same
Weight 21.0 kg 21.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 46.2 kg/kWp 45.7 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type TOPCon N-type vs TOPCon
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#3,073 vs #1,797
JKM460N-54HL4R-(V) leads by 1,276 places
Power density
#2,888 vs #1,876
JKM460N-54HL4R-(V) leads by 1,012 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#1,016 vs #805
JKM460N-54HL4R-(V) leads by 211 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#7,769 vs #7,286
JKM460N-54HL4R-(V) leads by 483 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) (455W) vs Jinko Solar 54HL4R-(V) 460W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) (455W) vs Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) (460W)
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) (455W) vs Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) 460W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) (455W) vs Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V)
2 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) (455W) vs Jinko Solar JKM460N-54HL4R-V
2 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) (455W) vs Jinko Solar 54HL4R-(V) 455W
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) (455W) or Jinko Solar JKM460N-54HL4R-(V)?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM460N-54HL4R-(V) has higher module efficiency (23.02% vs 22.77%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) (455W) and Jinko Solar JKM460N-54HL4R-(V)?
Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) (455 W) has a module efficiency of 22.77%, while Jinko Solar JKM460N-54HL4R-(V) is 23.02%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) (455W) use vs Jinko Solar JKM460N-54HL4R-(V)?
Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) (455 W) uses N-type cells; Jinko Solar JKM460N-54HL4R-(V) uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) (455W) and Jinko Solar JKM460N-54HL4R-(V)?
Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) (455 W) has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM460N-54HL4R-(V) has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 172 Jinko Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.