Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605
VS
The verdict
8 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is rated power: 50 W more power. 9 of 17 comparable parameters are identical, with 2 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.
See all 8 differencesHow alike are they
9
of 17 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
8 of 17 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JS210MHC132-655
JS210MHC120-605
Difference
Rated power
655 Wp
605 Wp
50 W more power
Weight
34.0 kg
30.6 kg
3.4 kg lighter
Module area
3.106 m²
2.830 m²
0.276 m² apart
Open-circuit voltage
45.50 V
41.70 V
3.80 V apart
Module efficiency
21.10 %
21.40 %
0.30 pp more efficient
Cell count
132
120
12 cells apart
Voltage at max power
37.61 V
34.50 V
3.11 V apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2172x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2172x1303x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.340 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JS210MHC132-655
21,741 kWh
JS210MHC120-605
20,081 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,660 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JS210MHC132-655
JS210MHC120-605
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
655 W
605 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.9% of rated power
622 W
574 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.8% of rated power
588 W
543 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.7% of rated power
555 W
512 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JS210MHC132-655
JS210MHC120-605
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
655 Wp
605 Wp
+50 W for JS210MHC132-655
Module efficiency
21.10 %
21.40 %
+0.30 pp for JS210MHC120-605
Power density
210.9 Wp/m²
213.8 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
45.50 V
41.70 V
3.80 V apart
Voltage at max power
37.61 V
34.50 V
3.11 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.48 A
18.57 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
17.42 A
17.54 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.340 %/°C
-0.340 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2172x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2172x1303x35 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
2.830 m²
0.276 m² apart
Weight
34.0 kg
30.6 kg
-3.4 kg for JS210MHC120-605
Weight per kWp
51.9 kg/kWp
50.6 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Performance warranty
25 yrs
25 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
PERC
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
120
12 cells apart
Bifacial
No
No
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#9,297
vs
#8,323
JS210MHC120-605 leads by 974 places
Power density
#9,459
vs
#8,350
JS210MHC120-605 leads by 1,109 places
Heat behaviour
#8,778
vs
#8,778
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,320
vs
#3,986
JS210MHC120-605 leads by 1,334 places
Warranty
#9,798
vs
#9,798
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,977
vs
#8,552
JS210MHC132-655 leads by 1,575 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-670
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-660
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-650
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-600
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-595
7 differences, the largest is rated power
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655 or Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605 has higher module efficiency (21.40% vs 21.10%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655 and Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605?
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655 has a module efficiency of 21.10%, while Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605 is 21.40%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655 use vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605?
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655 uses PERC cells; Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655 and Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605?
Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655 has a 25 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605 has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Shop prices: See 171 Jinko Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.