Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-670
VS
The verdict
JS210MHC132-670 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 65 W more power. 9 of 17 comparable parameters are identical, with 2 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.
See all 8 differencesHow alike are they
9
of 17 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
8 of 17 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JS210MHC120-605
JS210MHC132-670
Difference
Rated power
605 Wp
670 Wp
65 W more power
Weight
30.6 kg
34.0 kg
3.4 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage
41.70 V
46.10 V
4.40 V apart
Module area
2.830 m²
3.106 m²
0.276 m² apart
Module efficiency
21.40 %
21.60 %
0.20 pp more efficient
Cell count
120
132
12 cells apart
Voltage at max power
34.50 V
38.21 V
3.71 V apart
Dimensions
2172x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
2172x1303x35 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.340 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JS210MHC120-605
20,081 kWh
JS210MHC132-670
22,239 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,158 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JS210MHC120-605
JS210MHC132-670
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
605 W
670 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.9% of rated power
574 W
636 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.8% of rated power
543 W
602 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.7% of rated power
512 W
567 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JS210MHC120-605
JS210MHC132-670
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
605 Wp
670 Wp
+65 W for JS210MHC132-670
Module efficiency
21.40 %
21.60 %
+0.20 pp for JS210MHC132-670
Power density
213.8 Wp/m²
215.7 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
41.70 V
46.10 V
4.40 V apart
Voltage at max power
34.50 V
38.21 V
3.71 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.57 A
18.62 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
17.54 A
17.54 A
Same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.340 %/°C
-0.340 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2172x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
2172x1303x35 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area
2.830 m²
3.106 m²
0.276 m² apart
Weight
30.6 kg
34.0 kg
-3.4 kg for JS210MHC120-605
Weight per kWp
50.6 kg/kWp
50.7 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Performance warranty
25 yrs
25 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
PERC
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
120
132
12 cells apart
Bifacial
No
No
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#8,323
vs
#7,652
JS210MHC132-670 leads by 671 places
Power density
#8,350
vs
#7,644
JS210MHC132-670 leads by 706 places
Heat behaviour
#8,778
vs
#8,778
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#3,986
vs
#4,151
JS210MHC120-605 leads by 165 places
Warranty
#9,798
vs
#9,798
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#8,552
vs
#5,799
JS210MHC132-670 leads by 2,753 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-660
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-650
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-600
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-595
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605 or Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-670?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-670 has higher module efficiency (21.60% vs 21.40%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605 and Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-670?
Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605 has a module efficiency of 21.40%, while Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-670 is 21.60%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605 use vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-670?
Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605 uses PERC cells; Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-670 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605 and Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-670?
Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605 has a 25 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-670 has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Shop prices: See 171 Jinko Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.