Skip to main content
JS210MHC120-600 vs JS210MHC132-665 9 of 17 identical Swap Change panels

Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-600 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665

Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-600
JS210MHC120-600
600 Wp 21.20 % PERC Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
JS210MHC132-665
665 Wp 21.40 % PERC Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

JS210MHC132-665 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 65 W more power. 9 of 17 comparable parameters are identical, with 2 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.

See all 8 differences
How alike are they
9 of 17 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

8 of 17 parameters
Parameter JS210MHC120-600 JS210MHC132-665 Difference
Rated power 600 Wp 665 Wp 65 W more power
Weight 30.6 kg 34.0 kg 3.4 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage 41.50 V 45.90 V 4.40 V apart
Module area 2.830 m² 3.106 m² 0.276 m² apart
Module efficiency 21.20 % 21.40 % 0.20 pp more efficient
Cell count 120 132 12 cells apart
Voltage at max power 34.30 V 38.01 V 3.71 V apart
Dimensions 2172x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 2172x1303x35 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.340 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JS210MHC120-600
19,915 kWh
JS210MHC132-665
22,073 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,158 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JS210MHC120-600 JS210MHC132-665
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 600 W 665 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 569 W 631 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.8% of rated power 539 W 597 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.7% of rated power 508 W 563 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JS210MHC120-600 JS210MHC132-665 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 600 Wp 665 Wp +65 W for JS210MHC132-665
Module efficiency 21.20 % 21.40 % +0.20 pp for JS210MHC132-665
Power density 212.0 Wp/m² 214.1 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 41.50 V 45.90 V 4.40 V apart
Voltage at max power 34.30 V 38.01 V 3.71 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.52 A 18.57 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.49 A 17.50 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.340 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2172x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 2172x1303x35 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area 2.830 m² 3.106 m² 0.276 m² apart
Weight 30.6 kg 34.0 kg -3.4 kg for JS210MHC120-600
Weight per kWp 51.0 kg/kWp 51.1 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Performance warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 120 132 12 cells apart
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#9,076 vs #8,323
JS210MHC132-665 leads by 753 places
Power density
#9,096 vs #8,250
JS210MHC132-665 leads by 846 places
Heat behaviour
#8,778 vs #8,778
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,354 vs #4,471
JS210MHC120-600 leads by 117 places
Warranty
#9,798 vs #9,798
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#8,982 vs #6,248
JS210MHC132-665 leads by 2,734 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-600 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-670
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-600 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-660
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-600 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-600 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-650
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-600 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-600 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-595
One difference: module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-600 or Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 has higher module efficiency (21.40% vs 21.20%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-600 and Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665?
Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-600 has a module efficiency of 21.20%, while Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 is 21.40%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-600 use vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665?
Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-600 uses PERC cells; Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-600 and Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665?
Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-600 has a 25 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665 has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 171 Jinko Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.