Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-595 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-660
VS
The verdict
JS210MHC132-660 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 65 W more power. 9 of 17 comparable parameters are identical, with 2 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.
See all 8 differencesHow alike are they
9
of 17 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
8 of 17 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JS210MHC120-595
JS210MHC132-660
Difference
Rated power
595 Wp
660 Wp
65 W more power
Weight
30.6 kg
34.0 kg
3.4 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage
41.30 V
45.90 V
4.60 V apart
Module area
2.830 m²
3.106 m²
0.276 m² apart
Module efficiency
21.00 %
21.20 %
0.20 pp more efficient
Cell count
120
132
12 cells apart
Voltage at max power
34.10 V
37.81 V
3.71 V apart
Dimensions
2172x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
2172x1303x35 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.340 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JS210MHC120-595
19,749 kWh
JS210MHC132-660
21,907 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,158 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JS210MHC120-595
JS210MHC132-660
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
595 W
660 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.9% of rated power
565 W
626 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.8% of rated power
534 W
593 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.7% of rated power
504 W
559 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JS210MHC120-595
JS210MHC132-660
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
595 Wp
660 Wp
+65 W for JS210MHC132-660
Module efficiency
21.00 %
21.20 %
+0.20 pp for JS210MHC132-660
Power density
210.2 Wp/m²
212.5 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
41.30 V
45.90 V
4.60 V apart
Voltage at max power
34.10 V
37.81 V
3.71 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.47 A
18.57 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
17.45 A
17.46 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.340 %/°C
-0.340 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2172x1303x35 mm
2384x1303x35 mm
2172x1303x35 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area
2.830 m²
3.106 m²
0.276 m² apart
Weight
30.6 kg
34.0 kg
-3.4 kg for JS210MHC120-595
Weight per kWp
51.4 kg/kWp
51.5 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Performance warranty
25 yrs
25 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
PERC
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
120
132
12 cells apart
Bifacial
No
No
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#9,758
vs
#9,076
JS210MHC132-660 leads by 682 places
Power density
#9,670
vs
#8,959
JS210MHC132-660 leads by 711 places
Heat behaviour
#8,778
vs
#8,778
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,818
vs
#4,883
JS210MHC120-595 leads by 65 places
Warranty
#9,798
vs
#9,798
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#9,340
vs
#6,706
JS210MHC132-660 leads by 2,634 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-595 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-670
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-595 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-665
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-595 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-655
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-595 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-650
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-595 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-605
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-595 vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-600
One difference: module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-595 or Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-660?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-660 has higher module efficiency (21.20% vs 21.00%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-595 and Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-660?
Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-595 has a module efficiency of 21.00%, while Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-660 is 21.20%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-595 use vs Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-660?
Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-595 uses PERC cells; Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-660 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-595 and Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-660?
Jinko Solar JS210MHC120-595 has a 25 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JS210MHC132-660 has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Shop prices: See 171 Jinko Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.