Skip to main content
525 vs 550 12 of 17 identical Swap Change panels

Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-525 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-550

JS182MHC144-525
525 Wp 20.31 % PERC Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
JS182MHC144-550
550 Wp 21.28 % PERC Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

550 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.97 pp more efficient. 12 of 17 comparable parameters are identical, with 2 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.

See all 5 differences
How alike are they
12 of 17 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

5 of 17 parameters
Parameter 525 550 Difference
Module efficiency 20.31 % 21.28 % 0.97 pp more efficient
Power density 203.1 Wp/m² 212.8 Wp/m² 9.7 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 525 Wp 550 Wp 25 W more power
Weight per kWp 50.5 kg/kWp 48.2 kg/kWp 2.3 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power 41.00 V 42.00 V 1.00 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.350 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
525
17,615 kWh
550
18,454 kWh
Lifetime gap
839 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 525 550
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 525 W 550 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.8% of rated power 497 W 521 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.5% of rated power 470 W 492 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.2% of rated power 442 W 463 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 525 550 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 525 Wp 550 Wp +25 W for 550
Module efficiency 20.31 % 21.28 % +0.97 pp for 550
Power density 203.1 Wp/m² 212.8 Wp/m² +9.7 Wp/m² for 550
Open-circuit voltage 49.20 V 49.80 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.00 V 42.00 V 1.00 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.50 A 13.98 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 12.80 A 13.10 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.350 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2279x1134x35 mm 2279x1134x35 mm Same
Module area 2.584 m² 2.584 m² Same
Weight 26.5 kg 26.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 50.5 kg/kWp 48.2 kg/kWp -2.3 kg/kWp for 550
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Performance warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#11,752 vs #8,795
550 leads by 2,957 places
Power density
#11,750 vs #8,643
550 leads by 3,107 places
Heat behaviour
#10,419 vs #10,419
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#3,854 vs #2,087
550 leads by 1,767 places
Warranty
#9,798 vs #9,798
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#11,308 vs #10,186
550 leads by 1,122 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-525 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-545
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-525 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-540
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-525 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-535
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-525 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-530
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-525 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-510
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-525 vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC132-505
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-525 or Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-550?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-550 has higher module efficiency (21.28% vs 20.31%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-525 and Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-550?
Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-525 has a module efficiency of 20.31%, while Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-550 is 21.28%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-525 use vs Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-550?
Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-525 uses PERC cells; Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-550 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-525 and Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-550?
Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-525 has a 25 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JS182MHC144-550 has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 174 Jinko Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.