JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU
vs
JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (715W bin)
16 of 19 identical
Swap
Change panels
Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (715W bin)
VS
The verdict
JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.64 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 3 differencesHow alike are they
16
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
3 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU
JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (715W bin)
Difference
Module efficiency
23.66 %
23.02 %
0.64 pp more efficient
Power density
236.6 Wp/m²
230.2 Wp/m²
6.4 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
735 Wp
715 Wp
20 W more power
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU
24,661 kWh
JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (715W bin)
23,990 kWh
Lifetime gap
671 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU
JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (715W bin)
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
735 W
715 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
703 W
684 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
671 W
653 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
639 W
622 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU
JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (715W bin)
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
735 Wp
715 Wp
+20 W for JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU
Module efficiency
23.66 %
23.02 %
+0.64 pp for JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU
Power density
236.6 Wp/m²
230.2 Wp/m²
+6.4 Wp/m² for JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU
Open-circuit voltage
49.52 V
48.88 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
41.23 V
40.77 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
18.88 A
18.60 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
17.83 A
17.54 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
Same
Module area
3.106 m²
3.106 m²
Same
Weight
37.5 kg
37.5 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
51.0 kg/kWp
52.4 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#602
vs
#1,797
JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU leads by 1,195 places
Power density
#582
vs
#2,018
JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU leads by 1,436 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,360
vs
#5,979
JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU leads by 1,619 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#239
vs
#670
JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU leads by 431 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU or Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (715W bin)?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU has higher module efficiency (23.66% vs 23.02%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU and Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (715W bin)?
Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU has a module efficiency of 23.66%, while Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (715 W bin) is 23.02%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU use vs Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (715W bin)?
Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU uses TOPCon cells; Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (715 W bin) uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU and Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (715W bin)?
Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (715 W bin) has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU and Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (715W bin) bifacial panels?
Both Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU and Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (715 W bin) are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 172 Jinko Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

