Skip to main content
JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU vs JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV 12 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV

Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
735 Wp 23.66 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Jinko Solar JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV
JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV
640 Wp 23.69 % N-type Bifacial
The verdict

7 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is rated power: 95 W more power. 12 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 7 differences
How alike are they
12 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

7 of 19 parameters
Parameter JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV Difference
Rated power 735 Wp 640 Wp 95 W more power
Weight 37.5 kg 32.4 kg 5.1 kg lighter
Short-circuit current 18.88 A 16.32 A 2.56 A apart
Module area 3.106 m² 2.701 m² 0.405 m² apart
Cell technology TOPCon N-type TOPCon vs N-type
Current at max power 17.83 A 15.50 A 2.33 A apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
24,661 kWh
JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV
21,473 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,188 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 735 W 640 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 703 W 612 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 671 W 584 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 639 W 556 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 735 Wp 640 Wp +95 W for JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
Module efficiency 23.66 % 23.69 % Effectively the same
Power density 236.6 Wp/m² 236.9 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 49.52 V 49.88 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.23 V 41.30 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.88 A 16.32 A 2.56 A apart
Current at max power 17.83 A 15.50 A 2.33 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 2.701 m² 0.405 m² apart
Weight 37.5 kg 32.4 kg -5.1 kg for JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV
Weight per kWp 51.0 kg/kWp 50.6 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon N-type TOPCon vs N-type
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#602 vs #580
JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV leads by 22 places
Power density
#582 vs #521
JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV leads by 61 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,360 vs #4,069
JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV leads by 291 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#239 vs #1,530
JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU leads by 1,291 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU or Jinko Solar JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV has higher module efficiency (23.69% vs 23.66%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU and Jinko Solar JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV?
Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU has a module efficiency of 23.66%, while Jinko Solar JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV is 23.69%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU use vs Jinko Solar JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV?
Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU uses TOPCon cells; Jinko Solar JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU and Jinko Solar JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV?
Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU and Jinko Solar JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV bifacial panels?
Both Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU and Jinko Solar JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 171 Jinko Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.