JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
vs
JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)
19 of 19 identical
Swap
Change panels
Jinko Solar JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)
VS
The verdict
Identical on every published parameter
All 19 comparable parameters agree. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from.
How alike are they
19
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
0 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Every comparable parameter agrees. The full specification is below.
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
24,325 kWh
JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)
24,493 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
725 W
730 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
693 W
698 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
662 W
666 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
630 W
635 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
725 Wp
730 Wp
Effectively the same
Module efficiency
23.34 %
23.50 %
Effectively the same
Power density
233.4 Wp/m²
235.0 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
49.20 V
49.36 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
41.00 V
41.11 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
18.74 A
18.81 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
17.69 A
17.76 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
Same
Module area
3.106 m²
3.106 m²
Same
Weight
37.5 kg
37.5 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
51.7 kg/kWp
51.4 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#943
vs
#716
JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin) leads by 227 places
Power density
#936
vs
#800
JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin) leads by 136 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,085
vs
#4,748
JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin) leads by 337 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#397
vs
#302
JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin) leads by 95 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM730N-66HL5-BDV-Z6-EU
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (725W bin)
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU or Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730 W bin) has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 23.34%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU and Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)?
Jinko Solar JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU has a module efficiency of 23.34%, while Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730 W bin) is 23.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU use vs Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)?
Jinko Solar JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU uses TOPCon cells; Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730 W bin) uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU and Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin)?
Jinko Solar JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730 W bin) has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jinko Solar JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU and Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730W bin) bifacial panels?
Both Jinko Solar JKM725N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU and Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (730 W bin) are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 175 Jinko Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
