Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDX vs Jinko Solar JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU
VS
The verdict
13 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is rated power: 185 W more power. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 13 differencesHow alike are they
6
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
13 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JKM670N-66QL6-BDX
JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU
Difference
Rated power
670 Wp
485 Wp
185 W more power
Module efficiency
24.80 %
24.27 %
0.53 pp more efficient
Weight
38.8 kg
24.4 kg
14.4 kg lighter
Product warranty
12 yrs
25 yrs
13 yrs longer
Weight per kWp
57.9 kg/kWp
50.3 kg/kWp
7.6 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage
50.60 V
36.94 V
13.66 V apart
Module area
2.701 m²
1.998 m²
0.703 m² apart
Power density
248.0 Wp/m²
242.7 Wp/m²
5.3 Wp/m² higher
Cell technology
TOPCon
N-type
TOPCon vs N-type
Voltage at max power
42.92 V
31.50 V
11.42 V apart
Cell count
264
192
72 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JKM670N-66QL6-BDX
22,655 kWh
JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU
16,399 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,256 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JKM670N-66QL6-BDX
JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
670 W
485 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
96.1% of rated power
644 W
466 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
92.2% of rated power
618 W
447 W
Hot roof
70 °C
88.3% of rated power
592 W
428 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JKM670N-66QL6-BDX
JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
670 Wp
485 Wp
+185 W for JKM670N-66QL6-BDX
Module efficiency
24.80 %
24.27 %
+0.53 pp for JKM670N-66QL6-BDX
Power density
248.0 Wp/m²
242.7 Wp/m²
+5.3 Wp/m² for JKM670N-66QL6-BDX
Open-circuit voltage
50.60 V
36.94 V
13.66 V apart
Voltage at max power
42.92 V
31.50 V
11.42 V apart
Short-circuit current
16.34 A
15.94 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
15.61 A
15.40 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Module area
2.701 m²
1.998 m²
0.703 m² apart
Weight
38.8 kg
24.4 kg
-14.4 kg for JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU
Weight per kWp
57.9 kg/kWp
50.3 kg/kWp
-7.6 kg/kWp for JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
25 yrs
+13 yrs for JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
N-type
TOPCon vs N-type
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
264
192
72 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#12
vs
#164
JKM670N-66QL6-BDX leads by 152 places
Power density
#14
vs
#140
JKM670N-66QL6-BDX leads by 126 places
Heat behaviour
#511
vs
#511
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#11,487
vs
#3,707
JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU leads by 7,780 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#514
vs
#2,974
JKM670N-66QL6-BDX leads by 2,460 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDX vs Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class)
2 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDX vs Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (670W)
2 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDX vs Jinko Solar JKM645-670N-66QL6-BDV-L
3 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDX vs Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU
3 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDX vs Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (665W class)
2 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDX vs Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (665W)
2 differences, the largest is weight
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDX or Jinko Solar JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDX has higher module efficiency (24.80% vs 24.27%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDX and Jinko Solar JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU?
Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDX has a module efficiency of 24.80%, while Jinko Solar JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU is 24.27%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDX use vs Jinko Solar JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU?
Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDX uses TOPCon cells; Jinko Solar JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDX and Jinko Solar JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU?
Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDX has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDX and Jinko Solar JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU bifacial panels?
Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDX is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Jinko Solar JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 155 Jinko Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
