Skip to main content
JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU vs JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (665W class) 17 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (665W class)

Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU
JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU
670 Wp 24.80 % N-type Bifacial
VS
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (665W class)
JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (665W class)
665 Wp 24.62 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

One difference, none of them an advantage

The largest is cell technology: N-type vs TOPCon. 17 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See the one difference
How alike are they
17 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

1 of 18 parameters
Parameter JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (665W class) Difference
Cell technology N-type TOPCon N-type vs TOPCon
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU
22,655 kWh
JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (665W class)
22,486 kWh
Lifetime gap
169 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (665W class)
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 670 W 665 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.1% of rated power 644 W 639 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.2% of rated power 618 W 613 W
Hot roof 70 °C 88.3% of rated power 592 W 587 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (665W class) Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 670 Wp 665 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 24.80 % 24.62 % Effectively the same
Power density 248.0 Wp/m² 246.2 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 50.60 V 50.80 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 42.92 V 42.96 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 16.34 A 16.16 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 15.61 A 15.48 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.260 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.701 m² 2.701 m² Same
Weight 32.5 kg 32.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 48.5 kg/kWp 48.9 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.35 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type TOPCon N-type vs TOPCon
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 264 - Not published by Jinko Solar
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#12 vs #42
JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU leads by 30 places
Power density
#14 vs #42
JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU leads by 28 places
Heat behaviour
#511 vs #511
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#2,321 vs #2,555
JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU leads by 234 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#486 vs #634
JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU leads by 148 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class)
One difference: cell technology
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (670W)
One difference: cell technology
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM645-670N-66QL6-BDV-L
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDX
3 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (665W)
One difference: cell technology
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU or Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (665W class)?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU has higher module efficiency (24.80% vs 24.62%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU and Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (665W class)?
Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU has a module efficiency of 24.80%, while Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (665 W class) is 24.62%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU use vs Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (665W class)?
Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU uses N-type cells; Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (665 W class) uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU and Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (665W class)?
Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (665 W class) has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU and Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (665W class) bifacial panels?
Both Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU and Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (665 W class) are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 158 Jinko Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.