Skip to main content
JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU vs JKM670N-66QL6-BDX 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Jinko Solar JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDX

Jinko Solar JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU
JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU
665 Wp 24.62 % N-type Bifacial
VS
Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDX
JKM670N-66QL6-BDX
670 Wp 24.80 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU leads on the differences that matter

The largest is weight: 6.3 kg lighter. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU JKM670N-66QL6-BDX Difference
Weight 32.5 kg 38.8 kg 6.3 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 48.9 kg/kWp 57.9 kg/kWp 9.0 kg/kWp lighter
Cell technology N-type TOPCon N-type vs TOPCon
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU
22,486 kWh
JKM670N-66QL6-BDX
22,655 kWh
Lifetime gap
169 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU JKM670N-66QL6-BDX
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 665 W 670 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.1% of rated power 639 W 644 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.2% of rated power 613 W 618 W
Hot roof 70 °C 88.3% of rated power 587 W 592 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU JKM670N-66QL6-BDX Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 665 Wp 670 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 24.62 % 24.80 % Effectively the same
Power density 246.2 Wp/m² 248.0 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 50.55 V 50.60 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 42.85 V 42.92 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 16.24 A 16.34 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 15.52 A 15.61 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.260 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.701 m² 2.701 m² Same
Weight 32.5 kg 38.8 kg -6.3 kg for JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU
Weight per kWp 48.9 kg/kWp 57.9 kg/kWp -9.0 kg/kWp for JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.35 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type TOPCon N-type vs TOPCon
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 264 264 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#42 vs #12
JKM670N-66QL6-BDX leads by 30 places
Power density
#42 vs #14
JKM670N-66QL6-BDX leads by 28 places
Heat behaviour
#511 vs #511
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#2,555 vs #11,487
JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU leads by 8,932 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#634 vs #514
JKM670N-66QL6-BDX leads by 120 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class)
One difference: cell technology
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (670W)
One difference: cell technology
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM645-670N-66QL6-BDV-L
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (665W class)
One difference: cell technology
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (665W)
One difference: cell technology
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU or Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDX?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDX has higher module efficiency (24.80% vs 24.62%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU and Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDX?
Jinko Solar JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU has a module efficiency of 24.62%, while Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDX is 24.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU use vs Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDX?
Jinko Solar JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU uses N-type cells; Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDX uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU and Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDX?
Jinko Solar JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDX has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jinko Solar JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU and Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDX bifacial panels?
Both Jinko Solar JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU and Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDX are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 174 Jinko Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.