Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVH-670M
VS
The verdict
LR7-72HVH-670M leads on the differences that matter
The largest is weight: 4.0 kg lighter. 9 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 9 differencesHow alike are they
9
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
9 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class)
LR7-72HVH-670M
Difference
Weight
32.5 kg
28.5 kg
4.0 kg lighter
Product warranty
12 yrs
15 yrs
3 yrs longer
Weight per kWp
48.5 kg/kWp
42.5 kg/kWp
6.0 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage
50.98 V
54.30 V
3.32 V apart
Cell technology
TOPCon
N-type
TOPCon vs N-type
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Short-circuit current
16.22 A
15.60 A
0.62 A apart
Voltage at max power
43.09 V
44.96 V
1.87 V apart
Current at max power
15.55 A
14.91 A
0.64 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class)
22,655 kWh
LR7-72HVH-670M
22,655 kWh
Lifetime gap
No difference
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class)
LR7-72HVH-670M
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
670 W
670 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
96.1% of rated power
644 W
644 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
92.2% of rated power
618 W
618 W
Hot roof
70 °C
88.3% of rated power
592 W
592 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class)
LR7-72HVH-670M
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
670 Wp
670 Wp
Same
Module efficiency
24.80 %
24.80 %
Same
Power density
248.0 Wp/m²
248.0 Wp/m²
Same
Open-circuit voltage
50.98 V
54.30 V
3.32 V apart
Voltage at max power
43.09 V
44.96 V
1.87 V apart
Short-circuit current
16.22 A
15.60 A
0.62 A apart
Current at max power
15.55 A
14.91 A
0.64 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
Same
Module area
2.701 m²
2.701 m²
Same
Weight
32.5 kg
28.5 kg
-4.0 kg for LR7-72HVH-670M
Weight per kWp
48.5 kg/kWp
42.5 kg/kWp
-6.0 kg/kWp for LR7-72HVH-670M
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
15 yrs
+3 yrs for LR7-72HVH-670M
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
N-type
TOPCon vs N-type
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
-
144
Not published by Jinko Solar
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#12
vs
#12
Tied - the same position in the database
Power density
#14
vs
#14
Tied - the same position in the database
Heat behaviour
#511
vs
#511
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#2,321
vs
#226
LR7-72HVH-670M leads by 2,095 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#486
vs
#284
LR7-72HVH-670M leads by 202 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) vs Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (670W)
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) vs Jinko Solar JKM645-670N-66QL6-BDV-L
One difference: cell technology
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) vs Jinko Solar JKM670N-66QL6-BDV-F4-EU
One difference: cell technology
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) vs Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (665W class)
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) vs Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (665W)
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) vs Jinko Solar JKM665N-66QL6-BDV-AntiGlare-F1-EU
One difference: cell technology
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) or Longi Solar LR7-72HVH-670M?
According to our database: both panels are closely matched on key specs - the decision often comes down to price and local availability. See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) and Longi Solar LR7-72HVH-670M?
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670 W class) has a module efficiency of 24.80%, while Longi Solar LR7-72HVH-670M is 24.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) use vs Longi Solar LR7-72HVH-670M?
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670 W class) uses TOPCon cells; Longi Solar LR7-72HVH-670M uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) and Longi Solar LR7-72HVH-670M?
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670 W class) has a 30 years power warranty; Longi Solar LR7-72HVH-670M has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) and Longi Solar LR7-72HVH-670M bifacial panels?
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670 W class) is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Longi Solar LR7-72HVH-670M is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 173 Jinko Solar offers · See 174 Longi Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

