Jinko Solar JKM635N-66HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)
VS
The verdict
7 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is rated power: 100 W more power. 12 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 7 differencesHow alike are they
12
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
7 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JKM635N-66HL4M-BDV
JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)
Difference
Rated power
635 Wp
735 Wp
100 W more power
Weight
32.4 kg
37.5 kg
5.1 kg lighter
Short-circuit current
16.26 A
18.88 A
2.62 A apart
Module area
2.701 m²
3.106 m²
0.405 m² apart
Cell technology
N-type
TOPCon
N-type vs TOPCon
Current at max power
15.43 A
17.83 A
2.40 A apart
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JKM635N-66HL4M-BDV
21,306 kWh
JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)
24,661 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,355 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JKM635N-66HL4M-BDV
JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
635 W
735 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
607 W
703 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
580 W
671 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
552 W
639 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JKM635N-66HL4M-BDV
JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
635 Wp
735 Wp
+100 W for JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)
Module efficiency
23.51 %
23.66 %
Effectively the same
Power density
235.1 Wp/m²
236.6 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
49.68 V
49.52 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
41.16 V
41.23 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
16.26 A
18.88 A
2.62 A apart
Current at max power
15.43 A
17.83 A
2.40 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
2.701 m²
3.106 m²
0.405 m² apart
Weight
32.4 kg
37.5 kg
-5.1 kg for JKM635N-66HL4M-BDV
Weight per kWp
51.0 kg/kWp
51.0 kg/kWp
Same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
TOPCon
N-type vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#696
vs
#602
JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin) leads by 94 places
Power density
#741
vs
#582
JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin) leads by 159 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,372
vs
#4,360
JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin) leads by 12 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,741
vs
#239
JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin) leads by 1,502 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM635N-66HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM640N-66HL4M-BDV
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM635N-66HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM630N-66HL4M-BDV
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM635N-66HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM625N-66HL4M-BDV
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM635N-66HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM620N-66HL4M-BDV
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM635N-66HL4M-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM615N-66HL4M-BDV
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin) vs Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM635N-66HL4M-BDV or Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735 W bin) has higher module efficiency (23.66% vs 23.51%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM635N-66HL4M-BDV and Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)?
Jinko Solar JKM635N-66HL4M-BDV has a module efficiency of 23.51%, while Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735 W bin) is 23.66%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM635N-66HL4M-BDV use vs Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)?
Jinko Solar JKM635N-66HL4M-BDV uses N-type cells; Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735 W bin) uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM635N-66HL4M-BDV and Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)?
Jinko Solar JKM635N-66HL4M-BDV has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735 W bin) has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jinko Solar JKM635N-66HL4M-BDV and Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin) bifacial panels?
Both Jinko Solar JKM635N-66HL4M-BDV and Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735 W bin) are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 155 Jinko Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

