Skip to main content
JKM580N-72HL4-BDV vs JKM620N-78HL4-BDV 10 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Jinko Solar JKM580N-72HL4-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM620N-78HL4-BDV

JKM580N-72HL4-BDV
580 Wp 22.45 % N-type Bifacial
VS
JKM620N-78HL4-BDV
620 Wp 22.18 % N-type Bifacial Incomplete
The verdict

8 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is rated power: 40 W more power. 10 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 8 differences
How alike are they
10 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

8 of 18 parameters
Parameter JKM580N-72HL4-BDV JKM620N-78HL4-BDV Difference
Rated power 580 Wp 620 Wp 40 W more power
Open-circuit voltage 51.47 V 55.58 V 4.11 V apart
Module area 2.583 m² 2.795 m² 0.212 m² apart
Weight 32.0 kg 34.6 kg 2.6 kg lighter
Module efficiency 22.45 % 22.18 % 0.27 pp more efficient
Cell count 144 156 12 cells apart
Voltage at max power 42.59 V 45.93 V 3.34 V apart
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 2465x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm vs 2465x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JKM580N-72HL4-BDV
19,460 kWh
JKM620N-78HL4-BDV
20,802 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,342 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JKM580N-72HL4-BDV JKM620N-78HL4-BDV
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 580 W 620 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 554 W 592 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 528 W 564 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 502 W 536 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JKM580N-72HL4-BDV JKM620N-78HL4-BDV Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 580 Wp 620 Wp +40 W for JKM620N-78HL4-BDV
Module efficiency 22.45 % 22.18 % +0.27 pp for JKM580N-72HL4-BDV
Power density 224.5 Wp/m² 221.8 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 51.47 V 55.58 V 4.11 V apart
Voltage at max power 42.59 V 45.93 V 3.34 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.37 A 14.19 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.62 A 13.50 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 2465x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm vs 2465x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.583 m² 2.795 m² 0.212 m² apart
Weight 32.0 kg 34.6 kg -2.6 kg for JKM580N-72HL4-BDV
Weight per kWp 55.2 kg/kWp 55.8 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr - Not published by Jinko Solar
Technology
Cell technology N-type N-type Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 156 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#4,620 vs #5,930
JKM580N-72HL4-BDV leads by 1,310 places
Power density
#4,547 vs #5,869
JKM580N-72HL4-BDV leads by 1,322 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #6,093
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#9,588 vs #10,192
JKM580N-72HL4-BDV leads by 604 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,564 vs #3,481
JKM620N-78HL4-BDV leads by 1,083 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM580N-72HL4-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM615N-78HL4-BDV
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM580N-72HL4-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM610N-78HL4-BDV
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM580N-72HL4-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM605N-78HL4-BDV
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM580N-72HL4-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM575N-72HL4-BDV
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM580N-72HL4-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM570N-72HL4-BDV
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM580N-72HL4-BDV vs Jinko Solar JKM565N-72HL4-BDV
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM580N-72HL4-BDV or Jinko Solar JKM620N-78HL4-BDV?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM580N-72HL4-BDV has higher module efficiency (22.45% vs 22.18%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM580N-72HL4-BDV and Jinko Solar JKM620N-78HL4-BDV?
Jinko Solar JKM580N-72HL4-BDV has a module efficiency of 22.45%, while Jinko Solar JKM620N-78HL4-BDV is 22.18%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM580N-72HL4-BDV use vs Jinko Solar JKM620N-78HL4-BDV?
Jinko Solar JKM580N-72HL4-BDV uses N-type cells; Jinko Solar JKM620N-78HL4-BDV uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM580N-72HL4-BDV and Jinko Solar JKM620N-78HL4-BDV?
Jinko Solar JKM580N-72HL4-BDV has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM620N-78HL4-BDV has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jinko Solar JKM580N-72HL4-BDV and Jinko Solar JKM620N-78HL4-BDV bifacial panels?
Both Jinko Solar JKM580N-72HL4-BDV and Jinko Solar JKM620N-78HL4-BDV are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 176 Jinko Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.