Jinko Solar JKM525M-72HL4-BDVP vs Jinko Solar JKM555M-72HL4-BDVP
VS
The verdict
JKM555M-72HL4-BDVP leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.12 pp more efficient. 13 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 6 differencesHow alike are they
13
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
6 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JKM525M-72HL4-BDVP
JKM555M-72HL4-BDVP
Difference
Module efficiency
20.36 %
21.48 %
1.12 pp more efficient
Power density
203.6 Wp/m²
214.8 Wp/m²
11.3 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
525 Wp
555 Wp
30 W more power
Weight per kWp
65.3 kg/kWp
55.9 kg/kWp
9.5 kg/kWp lighter
Weight
34.3 kg
31.0 kg
3.3 kg lighter
Dimensions
2274x1134x30 mm
2278x1134x30 mm
2274x1134x30 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.350 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JKM525M-72HL4-BDVP
17,289 kWh
JKM555M-72HL4-BDVP
18,277 kWh
Lifetime gap
988 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JKM525M-72HL4-BDVP
JKM555M-72HL4-BDVP
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
525 W
555 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.8% of rated power
497 W
526 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.5% of rated power
470 W
497 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.2% of rated power
442 W
468 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JKM525M-72HL4-BDVP
JKM555M-72HL4-BDVP
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
525 Wp
555 Wp
+30 W for JKM555M-72HL4-BDVP
Module efficiency
20.36 %
21.48 %
+1.12 pp for JKM555M-72HL4-BDVP
Power density
203.6 Wp/m²
214.8 Wp/m²
+11.3 Wp/m² for JKM555M-72HL4-BDVP
Open-circuit voltage
49.42 V
50.30 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
40.80 V
41.70 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
13.63 A
14.07 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
12.87 A
13.31 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.350 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2274x1134x30 mm
2278x1134x30 mm
2274x1134x30 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
Module area
2.579 m²
2.583 m²
Effectively the same
Weight
34.3 kg
31.0 kg
-3.3 kg for JKM555M-72HL4-BDVP
Weight per kWp
65.3 kg/kWp
55.9 kg/kWp
-9.5 kg/kWp for JKM555M-72HL4-BDVP
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.45 %/yr
0.45 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
PERC
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
144
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#11,791
vs
#8,217
JKM555M-72HL4-BDVP leads by 3,574 places
Power density
#11,758
vs
#8,099
JKM555M-72HL4-BDVP leads by 3,659 places
Heat behaviour
#10,489
vs
#10,489
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#13,178
vs
#10,320
JKM555M-72HL4-BDVP leads by 2,858 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#9,196
vs
#6,633
JKM555M-72HL4-BDVP leads by 2,563 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM525M-72HL4-BDVP vs Jinko Solar JKM550M-72HL4-BDVP
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM525M-72HL4-BDVP vs Jinko Solar JKM545M-72HL4-BDVP
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM525M-72HL4-BDVP vs Jinko Solar JKM540M-72HL4-BDVP
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM525M-72HL4-BDVP vs Jinko Solar JKM535M-72HL4-BDVP
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM525M-72HL4-BDVP vs Jinko Solar JKM530M-72HL4-BDVP
The same specification on paper
Same manufacturer
Jinko Solar JKM525M-72HL4-BDVP vs Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM525M-72HL4-BDVP or Jinko Solar JKM555M-72HL4-BDVP?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM555M-72HL4-BDVP has higher module efficiency (21.48% vs 20.36%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM525M-72HL4-BDVP and Jinko Solar JKM555M-72HL4-BDVP?
Jinko Solar JKM525M-72HL4-BDVP has a module efficiency of 20.36%, while Jinko Solar JKM555M-72HL4-BDVP is 21.48%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM525M-72HL4-BDVP use vs Jinko Solar JKM555M-72HL4-BDVP?
Jinko Solar JKM525M-72HL4-BDVP uses PERC cells; Jinko Solar JKM555M-72HL4-BDVP uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM525M-72HL4-BDVP and Jinko Solar JKM555M-72HL4-BDVP?
Jinko Solar JKM525M-72HL4-BDVP has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM555M-72HL4-BDVP has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jinko Solar JKM525M-72HL4-BDVP and Jinko Solar JKM555M-72HL4-BDVP bifacial panels?
Both Jinko Solar JKM525M-72HL4-BDVP and Jinko Solar JKM555M-72HL4-BDVP are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 134 Jinko Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.