Skip to main content
JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU vs JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU 15 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Jinko Solar JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU

JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU
485 Wp 24.27 % TOPCon
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU
JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU
470 Wp 23.52 % N-type
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.75 pp more efficient. 15 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 4 differences
How alike are they
15 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

4 of 19 parameters
Parameter JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU Difference
Module efficiency 24.27 % 23.52 % 0.75 pp more efficient
Power density 242.7 Wp/m² 235.2 Wp/m² 7.5 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 485 Wp 470 Wp 15 W more power
Cell technology TOPCon N-type TOPCon vs N-type
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.260 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU
16,399 kWh
JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU
15,892 kWh
Lifetime gap
507 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 485 W 470 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.1% of rated power 466 W 452 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.2% of rated power 447 W 433 W
Hot roof 70 °C 88.3% of rated power 428 W 415 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 485 Wp 470 Wp +15 W for JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU
Module efficiency 24.27 % 23.52 % +0.75 pp for JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU
Power density 242.7 Wp/m² 235.2 Wp/m² +7.5 Wp/m² for JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU
Open-circuit voltage 36.94 V 36.19 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 31.50 V 30.97 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 15.94 A 15.80 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 15.40 A 15.18 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.260 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 1.998 m² 1.998 m² Same
Weight 24.4 kg 24.4 kg Same
Weight per kWp 50.3 kg/kWp 51.9 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.35 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon N-type TOPCon vs N-type
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 192 192 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#164 vs #678
JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU leads by 514 places
Power density
#140 vs #674
JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU leads by 534 places
Heat behaviour
#511 vs #511
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#3,707 vs #5,333
JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU leads by 1,626 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,974 vs #4,371
JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU leads by 1,397 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU
One difference: cell technology
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM480N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM480N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU
2 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM475N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM475N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU or Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU has higher module efficiency (24.27% vs 23.52%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU and Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU?
Jinko Solar JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU has a module efficiency of 24.27%, while Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU is 23.52%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU use vs Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU?
Jinko Solar JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU uses TOPCon cells; Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU and Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU?
Jinko Solar JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 174 Jinko Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.