Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU vs Luxor Solar LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG
VS
Luxor Solar
LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG
465 Wp
23.60 %
TOPCon
Bifacial
Incomplete
The verdict
8 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.030 %/°C better in heat. 10 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 8 differencesHow alike are they
10
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
8 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU
LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.030 %/°C better in heat
Product warranty
25 yrs
30 yrs
5 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage
36.19 V
39.80 V
3.61 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.80 A
14.80 A
1.00 A apart
Cell count
192
108
84 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Current at max power
15.18 A
14.00 A
1.18 A apart
Voltage at max power
30.97 V
33.23 V
2.26 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU
15,769 kWh
LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG
15,602 kWh
Lifetime gap
167 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU
LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
470 W
465 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
452 W
445 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
433 W
425 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
415 W
404 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU
LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
470 Wp
465 Wp
Effectively the same
Module efficiency
23.52 %
23.60 %
Effectively the same
Power density
235.2 Wp/m²
232.7 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
36.19 V
39.80 V
3.61 V apart
Voltage at max power
30.97 V
33.23 V
2.26 V apart
Short-circuit current
15.80 A
14.80 A
1.00 A apart
Current at max power
15.18 A
14.00 A
1.18 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.030 %/°C for JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU
Mechanical
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
Same
Module area
1.998 m²
1.998 m²
Same
Weight
24.4 kg
24.5 kg
Effectively the same
Weight per kWp
51.9 kg/kWp
52.7 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
25 yrs
30 yrs
+5 yrs for LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
-
Not published by Luxor Solar
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
192
108
84 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#678
vs
#627
LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG leads by 51 places
Power density
#674
vs
#1,115
JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU leads by 441 places
Heat behaviour
#511
vs
#2,165
JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU leads by 1,654 places
Weight
#5,333
vs
#6,318
JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU leads by 985 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,371
vs
#3,399
LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG leads by 972 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM485N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM480N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM480N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM475N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM475N-48QL6-DB-F4-EU
2 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU or Luxor Solar LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG?
According to our database: Luxor Solar LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG has higher module efficiency (23.60% vs 23.52%); Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU and Luxor Solar LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG?
Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU has a module efficiency of 23.52%, while Luxor Solar LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG is 23.60%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU use vs Luxor Solar LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG?
Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU uses TOPCon cells; Luxor Solar LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU and Luxor Solar LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG?
Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU has a 30 years power warranty; Luxor Solar LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU and Luxor Solar LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG bifacial panels?
Luxor Solar LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 171 Jinko Solar offers · See 9 Luxor Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.