Luxor Solar LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG vs Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU
Luxor Solar
LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG
465 Wp
23.60 %
TOPCon
Bifacial
Incomplete
VS
The verdict
8 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.030 %/°C better in heat. 10 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 8 differencesHow alike are they
10
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
8 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG
JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.030 %/°C better in heat
Product warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
5 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage
39.80 V
36.19 V
3.61 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.80 A
15.80 A
1.00 A apart
Cell count
108
192
84 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Current at max power
14.00 A
15.18 A
1.18 A apart
Voltage at max power
33.23 V
30.97 V
2.26 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG
15,602 kWh
JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU
15,769 kWh
Lifetime gap
167 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG
JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
465 W
470 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
445 W
452 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
425 W
433 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
404 W
415 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG
JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
465 Wp
470 Wp
Effectively the same
Module efficiency
23.60 %
23.52 %
Effectively the same
Power density
232.7 Wp/m²
235.2 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
39.80 V
36.19 V
3.61 V apart
Voltage at max power
33.23 V
30.97 V
2.26 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.80 A
15.80 A
1.00 A apart
Current at max power
14.00 A
15.18 A
1.18 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.030 %/°C for JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU
Mechanical
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
Same
Module area
1.998 m²
1.998 m²
Same
Weight
24.5 kg
24.4 kg
Effectively the same
Weight per kWp
52.7 kg/kWp
51.9 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
+5 yrs for LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
0.35 %/yr
Not published by Luxor Solar
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
192
84 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#627
vs
#678
LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG leads by 51 places
Power density
#1,115
vs
#674
JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU leads by 441 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#511
JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU leads by 1,654 places
Weight
#6,318
vs
#5,333
JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU leads by 985 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,399
vs
#4,371
LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG leads by 972 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-460M/182R188-108+ GG
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-455M/182R188-108+ GG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-450M/182R188-108+ GG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-445M/182R188-108+ GG
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX - 430 M/182-108+ GG
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Luxor Solar LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG or Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU?
According to our database: Luxor Solar LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG has higher module efficiency (23.60% vs 23.52%); Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Luxor Solar LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG and Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU?
Luxor Solar LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG has a module efficiency of 23.60%, while Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU is 23.52%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Luxor Solar LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG use vs Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU?
Luxor Solar LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG uses TOPCon cells; Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Luxor Solar LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG and Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU?
Luxor Solar LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Luxor Solar LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG and Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU bifacial panels?
Luxor Solar LX-465M/182R188-108+ GG is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Jinko Solar JKM470N-48QL6-DB-F2-EU is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 8 Luxor Solar offers · See 169 Jinko Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.