Jinko Solar JKM420N-54HL4-B vs Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV
VS
The verdict
JKM495-54HL4M-BDV leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.75 pp more efficient. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
5
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
14 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JKM420N-54HL4-B
JKM495-54HL4M-BDV
Difference
Module efficiency
21.51 %
22.26 %
0.75 pp more efficient
Rated power
420 Wp
495 Wp
75 W more power
Weight
22.0 kg
27.0 kg
5.0 kg lighter
Product warranty
25 yrs
15 yrs
10 yrs longer
Power density
215.1 Wp/m²
222.6 Wp/m²
7.5 Wp/m² higher
Module area
1.953 m²
2.224 m²
0.271 m² apart
Short-circuit current
13.80 A
15.58 A
1.78 A apart
Cell technology
N-type
TOPCon
N-type vs TOPCon
Open-circuit voltage
38.15 V
40.21 V
2.06 V apart
Weight per kWp
52.4 kg/kWp
54.5 kg/kWp
2.2 kg/kWp lighter
Current at max power
13.11 A
14.68 A
1.57 A apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Dimensions
1722x1134x30 mm
1961x1134x30 mm
1722x1134x30 mm vs 1961x1134x30 mm
Voltage at max power
32.04 V
33.72 V
1.68 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JKM420N-54HL4-B
14,092 kWh
JKM495-54HL4M-BDV
16,608 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,516 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JKM420N-54HL4-B
JKM495-54HL4M-BDV
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
420 W
495 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
402 W
473 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
383 W
452 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
365 W
430 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JKM420N-54HL4-B
JKM495-54HL4M-BDV
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
420 Wp
495 Wp
+75 W for JKM495-54HL4M-BDV
Module efficiency
21.51 %
22.26 %
+0.75 pp for JKM495-54HL4M-BDV
Power density
215.1 Wp/m²
222.6 Wp/m²
+7.5 Wp/m² for JKM495-54HL4M-BDV
Open-circuit voltage
38.15 V
40.21 V
2.06 V apart
Voltage at max power
32.04 V
33.72 V
1.68 V apart
Short-circuit current
13.80 A
15.58 A
1.78 A apart
Current at max power
13.11 A
14.68 A
1.57 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1722x1134x30 mm
1961x1134x30 mm
1722x1134x30 mm vs 1961x1134x30 mm
Module area
1.953 m²
2.224 m²
0.271 m² apart
Weight
22.0 kg
27.0 kg
-5.0 kg for JKM420N-54HL4-B
Weight per kWp
52.4 kg/kWp
54.5 kg/kWp
-2.2 kg/kWp for JKM420N-54HL4-B
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
25 yrs
15 yrs
+10 yrs for JKM420N-54HL4-B
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
TOPCon
N-type vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
108
Same
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#7,894
vs
#5,593
JKM495-54HL4M-BDV leads by 2,301 places
Power density
#7,882
vs
#5,521
JKM495-54HL4M-BDV leads by 2,361 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,859
vs
#8,872
JKM420N-54HL4-B leads by 3,013 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#8,575
vs
#7,128
JKM495-54HL4M-BDV leads by 1,447 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM420N-54HL4-B vs Jinko Solar JKM525-54HL4M-BDV
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM420N-54HL4-B vs Jinko Solar JKM520-54HL4M-BDV
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM420N-54HL4-B vs Jinko Solar JKM515-54HL4M-BDV
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM420N-54HL4-B vs Jinko Solar JKM510-54HL4M-BDV
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM420N-54HL4-B vs Jinko Solar JKM505-54HL4M-BDV
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM420N-54HL4-B vs Jinko Solar JKM500-54HL4M-BDV
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM420N-54HL4-B or Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV has higher module efficiency (22.26% vs 21.51%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM420N-54HL4-B and Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV?
Jinko Solar JKM420N-54HL4-B has a module efficiency of 21.51%, while Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV is 22.26%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM420N-54HL4-B use vs Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV?
Jinko Solar JKM420N-54HL4-B uses N-type cells; Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM420N-54HL4-B and Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV?
Jinko Solar JKM420N-54HL4-B has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jinko Solar JKM420N-54HL4-B and Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV bifacial panels?
Jinko Solar JKM495-54HL4M-BDV is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Jinko Solar JKM420N-54HL4-B is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 173 Jinko Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
