Skip to main content
JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU vs JKM630N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Jinko Solar JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM630N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU

Jinko Solar JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU
JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU
650 Wp 23.25 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Jinko Solar JKM630N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU
JKM630N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU
630 Wp 22.54 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.71 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU JKM630N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU Difference
Module efficiency 23.25 % 22.54 % 0.71 pp more efficient
Power density 232.5 Wp/m² 225.4 Wp/m² 7.2 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 650 Wp 630 Wp 20 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU
21,809 kWh
JKM630N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU
21,138 kWh
Lifetime gap
671 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU JKM630N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 650 W 630 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 622 W 603 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 593 W 575 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 565 W 548 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU JKM630N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 650 Wp 630 Wp +20 W for JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU
Module efficiency 23.25 % 22.54 % +0.71 pp for JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU
Power density 232.5 Wp/m² 225.4 Wp/m² +7.2 Wp/m² for JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU
Open-circuit voltage 57.60 V 57.08 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 48.33 V 47.70 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.10 A 13.86 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.45 A 13.21 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2465x1134x30 mm 2465x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.795 m² 2.795 m² Same
Weight 34.0 kg 34.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 52.3 kg/kWp 54.0 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 156 156 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,239 vs #3,920
JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU leads by 2,681 places
Power density
#1,222 vs #3,907
JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU leads by 2,685 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,769 vs #8,163
JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU leads by 2,394 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,648 vs #2,684
JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU leads by 1,036 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM645N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM640N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM635N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM625N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Jinko Solar JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)
11 differences, the largest is rated power
Same manufacturer
Jinko Solar JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU vs Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
11 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU or Jinko Solar JKM630N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU has higher module efficiency (23.25% vs 22.54%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU and Jinko Solar JKM630N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU?
Jinko Solar JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU has a module efficiency of 23.25%, while Jinko Solar JKM630N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU is 22.54%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU use vs Jinko Solar JKM630N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU?
Jinko Solar JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU uses TOPCon cells; Jinko Solar JKM630N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU and Jinko Solar JKM630N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU?
Jinko Solar JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM630N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jinko Solar JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU and Jinko Solar JKM630N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU bifacial panels?
Both Jinko Solar JKM650N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU and Jinko Solar JKM630N-78HL4-BDV-F9-EU are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 170 Jinko Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.