Skip to main content
(630W bin) vs (625W bin) 19 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Jinko Solar JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (630W bin) vs Jinko Solar JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (625W bin)

Jinko Solar JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (630W bin)
JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (630W bin)
630 Wp 23.32 % TOPCon
VS
Jinko Solar JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (625W bin)
JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (625W bin)
625 Wp 23.14 % TOPCon
The verdict

Identical on every published parameter

All 19 comparable parameters agree. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from.

How alike are they
19 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

0 of 19 parameters

Every comparable parameter agrees. The full specification is below.

02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
(630W bin)
21,138 kWh
(625W bin)
20,970 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario (630W bin) (625W bin)
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 630 W 625 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 603 W 598 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 575 W 571 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 548 W 543 W
03

Full specification

Parameter (630W bin) (625W bin) Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 630 Wp 625 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 23.32 % 23.14 % Effectively the same
Power density 233.2 Wp/m² 231.4 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 49.27 V 49.11 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.23 V 41.07 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 16.29 A 16.22 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 15.28 A 15.22 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x35 mm 2382x1134x35 mm Same
Module area 2.701 m² 2.701 m² Same
Weight 28.2 kg 28.2 kg Same
Weight per kWp 44.8 kg/kWp 45.1 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#973 vs #1,509
(630W bin) leads by 536 places
Power density
#1,003 vs #1,513
(630W bin) leads by 510 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#526 vs #619
(630W bin) leads by 93 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,895 vs #2,169
(630W bin) leads by 274 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (630W bin) vs Jinko Solar JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (635W bin)
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (630W bin) vs Jinko Solar JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (620W bin)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (630W bin) vs Jinko Solar JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (615W bin)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (630W bin) vs Jinko Solar JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (610W bin)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Jinko Solar JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (630W bin) vs Jinko Solar JKM710-735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU (735W bin)
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same manufacturer
Jinko Solar JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (630W bin) vs Jinko Solar JKM735N-66HL5-BDV-Z3-EU
10 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (630W bin) or Jinko Solar JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (625W bin)?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (630 W bin) has higher module efficiency (23.32% vs 23.14%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (630W bin) and Jinko Solar JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (625W bin)?
Jinko Solar JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (630 W bin) has a module efficiency of 23.32%, while Jinko Solar JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (625 W bin) is 23.14%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (630W bin) use vs Jinko Solar JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (625W bin)?
Jinko Solar JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (630 W bin) uses TOPCon cells; Jinko Solar JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (625 W bin) uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (630W bin) and Jinko Solar JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (625W bin)?
Jinko Solar JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (630 W bin) has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM610-635N-66HL4M-(V) (625 W bin) has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 176 Jinko Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.