Skip to main content
JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) vs 54HL4R-(V) 455W 17 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) vs Jinko Solar 54HL4R-(V) 455W

Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V)
JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V)
460 Wp 23.02 % TOPCon
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Jinko Solar 54HL4R-(V) 455W
54HL4R-(V) 455W
455 Wp 22.77 % N-type
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.25 pp more efficient. 17 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 2 differences
How alike are they
17 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

2 of 19 parameters
Parameter JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) 54HL4R-(V) 455W Difference
Module efficiency 23.02 % 22.77 % 0.25 pp more efficient
Cell technology TOPCon N-type TOPCon vs N-type
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V)
15,434 kWh
54HL4R-(V) 455W
15,266 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) 54HL4R-(V) 455W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 460 W 455 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 440 W 435 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 420 W 415 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 400 W 396 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) 54HL4R-(V) 455W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 460 Wp 455 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 23.02 % 22.77 % +0.25 pp for JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V)
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 227.7 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 40.17 V 39.98 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 33.60 V 33.41 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.14 A 14.07 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.69 A 13.62 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 1.998 m² 1.998 m² Same
Weight 21.0 kg 21.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 45.7 kg/kWp 46.2 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon N-type TOPCon vs N-type
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,797 vs #3,073
JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) leads by 1,276 places
Power density
#1,876 vs #2,888
JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) leads by 1,012 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#805 vs #1,016
JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) leads by 211 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#7,286 vs #7,769
JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) leads by 483 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) vs Jinko Solar 54HL4R-(V) 460W
One difference: cell technology
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) vs Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) (460W)
One difference: cell technology
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) vs Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) 460W
One difference: cell technology
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) vs Jinko Solar JKM460N-54HL4R-(V)
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) vs Jinko Solar JKM460N-54HL4R-V
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) vs Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) (455W)
2 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) or Jinko Solar 54HL4R-(V) 455W?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) has higher module efficiency (23.02% vs 22.77%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) and Jinko Solar 54HL4R-(V) 455W?
Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) has a module efficiency of 23.02%, while Jinko Solar 54HL4R-(V) 455 W is 22.77%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) use vs Jinko Solar 54HL4R-(V) 455W?
Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) uses TOPCon cells; Jinko Solar 54HL4R-(V) 455 W uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) and Jinko Solar 54HL4R-(V) 455W?
Jinko Solar JKM435-460N-54HL4R-(V) has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar 54HL4R-(V) 455 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 172 Jinko Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.