Skip to main content
370 vs 375 17 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

JA Solar MYM2072-370 vs JA Solar MYM2072-375

JA Solar MYM2072-370
MYM2072-370
370 Wp 19.07 % PERC Incomplete
VS
JA Solar MYM2072-375
MYM2072-375
375 Wp 19.33 % PERC Incomplete
The verdict

375 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.26 pp more efficient. 17 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See the one difference
How alike are they
17 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

1 of 18 parameters
Parameter 370 375 Difference
Module efficiency 19.07 % 19.33 % 0.26 pp more efficient
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.370 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
370
12,414 kWh
375
12,582 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 370 375
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 370 W 375 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.5% of rated power 349 W 354 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 88.9% of rated power 329 W 333 W
Hot roof 70 °C 83.3% of rated power 308 W 313 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 370 375 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 370 Wp 375 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 19.07 % 19.33 % +0.26 pp for 375
Power density 190.7 Wp/m² 193.3 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 48.70 V 48.70 V Same
Voltage at max power 39.70 V 39.80 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 9.88 A 9.94 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 9.32 A 9.42 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.370 %/°C -0.370 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1956x992x40 mm 1956x992x40 mm Same
Module area 1.940 m² 1.940 m² Same
Weight 22.5 kg 22.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 60.8 kg/kWp 60.0 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 72 72 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#12,923 vs #12,783
375 leads by 140 places
Power density
#12,900 vs #12,766
375 leads by 134 places
Heat behaviour
#13,081 vs #13,081
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#12,539 vs #12,326
375 leads by 213 places
Warranty
#9,798 vs #9,798
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#12,851 vs #12,760
375 leads by 91 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
JA Solar MYM2072-370 vs JA Solar MYM2072-385
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar MYM2072-370 vs JA Solar MYM2072-380
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar MYM2072-370 vs JA Solar MYM2072-365
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar MYM2072-370 vs JA Solar MYM2060-325
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar MYM2072-370 vs JA Solar MYM2060-320
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
JA Solar MYM2072-370 vs JA Solar MYM2060-315
9 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: JA Solar MYM2072-370 or JA Solar MYM2072-375?
According to our database: JA Solar MYM2072-375 has higher module efficiency (19.33% vs 19.07%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar MYM2072-370 and JA Solar MYM2072-375?
JA Solar MYM2072-370 has a module efficiency of 19.07%, while JA Solar MYM2072-375 is 19.33%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar MYM2072-370 use vs JA Solar MYM2072-375?
JA Solar MYM2072-370 uses PERC cells; JA Solar MYM2072-375 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar MYM2072-370 and JA Solar MYM2072-375?
JA Solar MYM2072-370 has a 25 years power warranty; JA Solar MYM2072-375 has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 390 JA Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.