JA Solar JAM78D40-625/MB/1500V vs JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB
VS
The verdict
JAM66D46-735/LB leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.30 pp more efficient. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
5
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
14 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JAM78D40-625/MB/1500V
JAM66D46-735/LB
Difference
Module efficiency
22.40 %
23.70 %
1.30 pp more efficient
Rated power
625 Wp
735 Wp
110 W more power
Power density
223.6 Wp/m²
236.6 Wp/m²
13.0 Wp/m² higher
Weight
34.6 kg
38.2 kg
3.6 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage
55.49 V
49.60 V
5.89 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.36 A
18.70 A
4.34 A apart
Module area
2.795 m²
3.106 m²
0.311 m² apart
Weight per kWp
55.4 kg/kWp
52.0 kg/kWp
3.4 kg/kWp lighter
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.010 %/°C better in heat
Cell technology
N-type
TOPCon
N-type vs TOPCon
Voltage at max power
46.37 V
41.77 V
4.60 V apart
Current at max power
13.48 A
17.60 A
4.12 A apart
Cell count
156
132
24 cells apart
Dimensions
2465x1134x35 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2465x1134x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
JAM78D40-625/MB/1500V
20,970 kWh
JAM66D46-735/LB
24,661 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,691 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JAM78D40-625/MB/1500V
JAM66D46-735/LB
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
625 W
735 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
597 W
703 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
569 W
671 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
541 W
639 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JAM78D40-625/MB/1500V
JAM66D46-735/LB
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
625 Wp
735 Wp
+110 W for JAM66D46-735/LB
Module efficiency
22.40 %
23.70 %
+1.30 pp for JAM66D46-735/LB
Power density
223.6 Wp/m²
236.6 Wp/m²
+13.0 Wp/m² for JAM66D46-735/LB
Open-circuit voltage
55.49 V
49.60 V
5.89 V apart
Voltage at max power
46.37 V
41.77 V
4.60 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.36 A
18.70 A
4.34 A apart
Current at max power
13.48 A
17.60 A
4.12 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.010 %/°C for JAM66D46-735/LB
Mechanical
Dimensions
2465x1134x35 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2465x1134x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
2.795 m²
3.106 m²
0.311 m² apart
Weight
34.6 kg
38.2 kg
-3.6 kg for JAM78D40-625/MB/1500V
Weight per kWp
55.4 kg/kWp
52.0 kg/kWp
-3.4 kg/kWp for JAM66D46-735/LB
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
TOPCon
N-type vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
156
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#4,774
vs
#517
JAM66D46-735/LB leads by 4,257 places
Power density
#4,955
vs
#582
JAM66D46-735/LB leads by 4,373 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093
vs
#2,165
JAM66D46-735/LB leads by 3,928 places
Weight
#9,802
vs
#5,413
JAM66D46-735/LB leads by 4,389 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,028
vs
#233
JAM66D46-735/LB leads by 2,795 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM78D40-625/MB/1500V vs JA Solar JAM78D40-620/MB/1500V
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM78D40-625/MB/1500V vs JA Solar JAM78D40-615/MB/1500V
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM78D40-625/MB/1500V vs JA Solar JAM78D40-610/MB/1500V
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM78D40-625/MB/1500V vs JA Solar JAM78D40-605/MB/1500V
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM78D40-625/MB/1500V vs JA Solar JAM78D40-600/MB/1500V
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM78D40-625/MB/1500V or JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB?
According to our database: JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB has higher module efficiency (23.70% vs 22.40%); JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM78D40-625/MB/1500V and JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB?
JA Solar JAM78D40-625/MB/1500V has a module efficiency of 22.40%, while JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB is 23.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar JAM78D40-625/MB/1500V use vs JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB?
JA Solar JAM78D40-625/MB/1500V uses N-type cells; JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM78D40-625/MB/1500V and JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB?
JA Solar JAM78D40-625/MB/1500V has a 30 years power warranty; JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are JA Solar JAM78D40-625/MB/1500V and JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB bifacial panels?
Both JA Solar JAM78D40-625/MB/1500V and JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 393 JA Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
