Skip to main content
650/LR vs 625/LR 15 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

JA Solar JAM72S42-650/LR vs JA Solar JAM72S42-625/LR

JA Solar JAM72S42-650/LR
JAM72S42-650/LR
650 Wp 23.30 % TOPCon
VS
JA Solar JAM72S42-625/LR
JAM72S42-625/LR
625 Wp 22.40 % TOPCon
The verdict

650/LR leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.90 pp more efficient. 15 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 4 differences
How alike are they
15 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

4 of 19 parameters
Parameter 650/LR 625/LR Difference
Module efficiency 23.30 % 22.40 % 0.90 pp more efficient
Power density 232.5 Wp/m² 223.6 Wp/m² 8.9 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 650 Wp 625 Wp 25 W more power
Open-circuit voltage 53.27 V 52.27 V 1.00 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
650/LR
21,809 kWh
625/LR
20,970 kWh
Lifetime gap
839 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 650/LR 625/LR
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 650 W 625 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 622 W 598 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 593 W 571 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 565 W 543 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 650/LR 625/LR Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 650 Wp 625 Wp +25 W for 650/LR
Module efficiency 23.30 % 22.40 % +0.90 pp for 650/LR
Power density 232.5 Wp/m² 223.6 Wp/m² +8.9 Wp/m² for 650/LR
Open-circuit voltage 53.27 V 52.27 V 1.00 V apart
Voltage at max power 44.67 V 43.71 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 15.41 A 15.16 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 14.55 A 14.30 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2465x1134x30 mm 2465x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.795 m² 2.795 m² Same
Weight 29.6 kg 29.6 kg Same
Weight per kWp 45.5 kg/kWp 47.4 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,017 vs #4,774
650/LR leads by 3,757 places
Power density
#1,222 vs #4,955
650/LR leads by 3,733 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#761 vs #1,649
650/LR leads by 888 places
Warranty
#9,798 vs #9,798
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,158 vs #3,995
650/LR leads by 1,837 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72S42-650/LR vs JA Solar JAM72S42-645/LR
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72S42-650/LR vs JA Solar JAM72S42-640/LR
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72S42-650/LR vs JA Solar JAM72S42-635/LR
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72S42-650/LR vs JA Solar JAM72S42-630/LR
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72S42-650/LR vs JA Solar JAM72S40-605/LR
9 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72S42-650/LR vs JA Solar JAM72S40-600/LR
9 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM72S42-650/LR or JA Solar JAM72S42-625/LR?
According to our database: JA Solar JAM72S42-650/LR has higher module efficiency (23.30% vs 22.40%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM72S42-650/LR and JA Solar JAM72S42-625/LR?
JA Solar JAM72S42-650/LR has a module efficiency of 23.30%, while JA Solar JAM72S42-625/LR is 22.40%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar JAM72S42-650/LR use vs JA Solar JAM72S42-625/LR?
JA Solar JAM72S42-650/LR uses TOPCon cells; JA Solar JAM72S42-625/LR uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM72S42-650/LR and JA Solar JAM72S42-625/LR?
JA Solar JAM72S42-650/LR has a 25 years power warranty; JA Solar JAM72S42-625/LR has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 391 JA Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.