Skip to main content
JAM72D42-630/LB vs JAM72D40-610/LB 11 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

JA Solar JAM72D42-630/LB vs JA Solar JAM72D40-610/LB

JA Solar JAM72D42-630/LB
JAM72D42-630/LB
630 Wp 22.50 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
JA Solar JAM72D40-610/LB
JAM72D40-610/LB
610 Wp 23.10 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

JAM72D40-610/LB leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.60 pp more efficient. 11 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 8 differences
How alike are they
11 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

8 of 19 parameters
Parameter JAM72D42-630/LB JAM72D40-610/LB Difference
Module efficiency 22.50 % 23.10 % 0.60 pp more efficient
Rated power 630 Wp 610 Wp 20 W more power
Module area 2.795 m² 2.646 m² 0.150 m² apart
Power density 225.4 Wp/m² 230.6 Wp/m² 5.2 Wp/m² higher
Weight 34.6 kg 32.5 kg 2.1 kg lighter
Short-circuit current 15.21 A 14.57 A 0.64 A apart
Dimensions 2465x1134x30 mm 2333x1134x30 mm 2465x1134x30 mm vs 2333x1134x30 mm
Current at max power 14.35 A 13.83 A 0.52 A apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JAM72D42-630/LB
21,138 kWh
JAM72D40-610/LB
20,467 kWh
Lifetime gap
671 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JAM72D42-630/LB JAM72D40-610/LB
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 630 W 610 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 603 W 583 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 575 W 557 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 548 W 530 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JAM72D42-630/LB JAM72D40-610/LB Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 630 Wp 610 Wp +20 W for JAM72D42-630/LB
Module efficiency 22.50 % 23.10 % +0.60 pp for JAM72D40-610/LB
Power density 225.4 Wp/m² 230.6 Wp/m² +5.2 Wp/m² for JAM72D40-610/LB
Open-circuit voltage 52.47 V 52.80 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 43.90 V 44.11 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 15.21 A 14.57 A 0.64 A apart
Current at max power 14.35 A 13.83 A 0.52 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2465x1134x30 mm 2333x1134x30 mm 2465x1134x30 mm vs 2333x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.795 m² 2.646 m² 0.150 m² apart
Weight 34.6 kg 32.5 kg -2.1 kg for JAM72D40-610/LB
Weight per kWp 54.9 kg/kWp 53.3 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#4,222 vs #1,570
JAM72D40-610/LB leads by 2,652 places
Power density
#3,907 vs #1,689
JAM72D40-610/LB leads by 2,218 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#9,305 vs #7,135
JAM72D40-610/LB leads by 2,170 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,749 vs #2,742
JAM72D40-610/LB leads by 7 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72D42-630/LB vs JA Solar JAM72D42-650/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72D42-630/LB vs JA Solar JAM72D42-645/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72D42-630/LB vs JA Solar JAM72D42-640/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72D42-630/LB vs JA Solar JAM72D42-635/LB
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72D42-630/LB vs JA Solar JAM72D42-625/LB
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72D42-630/LB vs JA Solar JAM72D40-615/LB
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM72D42-630/LB or JA Solar JAM72D40-610/LB?
According to our database: JA Solar JAM72D40-610/LB has higher module efficiency (23.10% vs 22.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM72D42-630/LB and JA Solar JAM72D40-610/LB?
JA Solar JAM72D42-630/LB has a module efficiency of 22.50%, while JA Solar JAM72D40-610/LB is 23.10%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar JAM72D42-630/LB use vs JA Solar JAM72D40-610/LB?
JA Solar JAM72D42-630/LB uses TOPCon cells; JA Solar JAM72D40-610/LB uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM72D42-630/LB and JA Solar JAM72D40-610/LB?
JA Solar JAM72D42-630/LB has a 30 years power warranty; JA Solar JAM72D40-610/LB has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are JA Solar JAM72D42-630/LB and JA Solar JAM72D40-610/LB bifacial panels?
Both JA Solar JAM72D42-630/LB and JA Solar JAM72D40-610/LB are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 389 JA Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.