JA Solar JAM72D30-560/LB/1500V vs JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB
VS
The verdict
JAM66D46-740/LB leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 2.60 pp more efficient. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 13 differencesHow alike are they
6
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
13 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JAM72D30-560/LB/1500V
JAM66D46-740/LB
Difference
Module efficiency
21.20 %
23.80 %
2.60 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.350 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.060 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
560 Wp
740 Wp
180 W more power
Power density
211.7 Wp/m²
238.2 Wp/m²
26.6 Wp/m² higher
Weight
32.5 kg
38.2 kg
5.7 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
58.0 kg/kWp
51.6 kg/kWp
6.4 kg/kWp lighter
Short-circuit current
14.25 A
18.73 A
4.48 A apart
Module area
2.646 m²
3.106 m²
0.461 m² apart
Cell technology
PERC
TOPCon
PERC vs TOPCon
Current at max power
13.50 A
17.64 A
4.14 A apart
Cell count
144
132
12 cells apart
Annual degradation
0.45 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
0.05 %/yr slower
Dimensions
2333x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2333x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
JAM72D30-560/LB/1500V
18,441 kWh
JAM66D46-740/LB
24,828 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,387 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JAM72D30-560/LB/1500V
JAM66D46-740/LB
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
560 W
740 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.8% of rated power
531 W
708 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.5% of rated power
501 W
676 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.2% of rated power
472 W
643 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JAM72D30-560/LB/1500V
JAM66D46-740/LB
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
560 Wp
740 Wp
+180 W for JAM66D46-740/LB
Module efficiency
21.20 %
23.80 %
+2.60 pp for JAM66D46-740/LB
Power density
211.7 Wp/m²
238.2 Wp/m²
+26.6 Wp/m² for JAM66D46-740/LB
Open-circuit voltage
50.32 V
49.80 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
41.49 V
41.96 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
14.25 A
18.73 A
4.48 A apart
Current at max power
13.50 A
17.64 A
4.14 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.350 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.060 %/°C for JAM66D46-740/LB
Mechanical
Dimensions
2333x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2333x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
2.646 m²
3.106 m²
0.461 m² apart
Weight
32.5 kg
38.2 kg
-5.7 kg for JAM72D30-560/LB/1500V
Weight per kWp
58.0 kg/kWp
51.6 kg/kWp
-6.4 kg/kWp for JAM66D46-740/LB
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.45 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
-0.05 %/yr for JAM66D46-740/LB
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
TOPCon
PERC vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
132
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#9,076
vs
#433
JAM66D46-740/LB leads by 8,643 places
Power density
#9,174
vs
#431
JAM66D46-740/LB leads by 8,743 places
Heat behaviour
#10,419
vs
#2,165
JAM66D46-740/LB leads by 8,254 places
Weight
#11,535
vs
#4,997
JAM66D46-740/LB leads by 6,538 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,761
vs
#185
JAM66D46-740/LB leads by 6,576 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72D30-560/LB/1500V vs JA Solar JAM72D30-580/LB/1500V
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72D30-560/LB/1500V vs JA Solar JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72D30-560/LB/1500V vs JA Solar JAM72D30-570/LB/1500V
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72D30-560/LB/1500V vs JA Solar JAM72D30-565/LB/1500V
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM72D30-560/LB/1500V vs JA Solar JAM72D30-555/LB/1500V
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM72D30-560/LB/1500V or JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB?
According to our database: JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB has higher module efficiency (23.80% vs 21.20%); JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM72D30-560/LB/1500V and JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB?
JA Solar JAM72D30-560/LB/1500V has a module efficiency of 21.20%, while JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB is 23.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar JAM72D30-560/LB/1500V use vs JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB?
JA Solar JAM72D30-560/LB/1500V uses PERC cells; JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM72D30-560/LB/1500V and JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB?
JA Solar JAM72D30-560/LB/1500V has a 30 years power warranty; JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are JA Solar JAM72D30-560/LB/1500V and JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB bifacial panels?
Both JA Solar JAM72D30-560/LB/1500V and JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 389 JA Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
