Skip to main content
JAM66D46-735/LB vs JAT54S41-470/LR 5 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB vs JA Solar JAT54S41-470/LR

JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB
JAM66D46-735/LB
735 Wp 23.70 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
JA Solar JAT54S41-470/LR
JAT54S41-470/LR
470 Wp 23.50 % TOPCon
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

JAT54S41-470/LR leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 265 W more power. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 14 differences
How alike are they
5 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

14 of 19 parameters
Parameter JAM66D46-735/LB JAT54S41-470/LR Difference
Rated power 735 Wp 470 Wp 265 W more power
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.260 %/°C 0.030 %/°C better in heat
Weight 38.2 kg 19.3 kg 18.9 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 52.0 kg/kWp 41.1 kg/kWp 10.9 kg/kWp lighter
Product warranty 12 yrs 25 yrs 13 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage 49.60 V 40.96 V 8.64 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.70 A 14.84 A 3.86 A apart
Module area 3.106 m² 1.998 m² 1.108 m² apart
Module efficiency 23.70 % 23.50 % 0.20 pp more efficient
Voltage at max power 41.77 V 34.74 V 7.03 V apart
Current at max power 17.60 A 13.54 A 4.06 A apart
Cell count 132 108 24 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
JAM66D46-735/LB
24,661 kWh
JAT54S41-470/LR
15,769 kWh
Lifetime gap
8,892 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JAM66D46-735/LB JAT54S41-470/LR
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 735 W 470 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 703 W 452 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 671 W 433 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 639 W 415 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JAM66D46-735/LB JAT54S41-470/LR Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 735 Wp 470 Wp +265 W for JAM66D46-735/LB
Module efficiency 23.70 % 23.50 % +0.20 pp for JAM66D46-735/LB
Power density 236.6 Wp/m² 235.2 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 49.60 V 40.96 V 8.64 V apart
Voltage at max power 41.77 V 34.74 V 7.03 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.70 A 14.84 A 3.86 A apart
Current at max power 17.60 A 13.54 A 4.06 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.260 %/°C +0.030 %/°C for JAT54S41-470/LR
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 1.998 m² 1.108 m² apart
Weight 38.2 kg 19.3 kg -18.9 kg for JAT54S41-470/LR
Weight per kWp 52.0 kg/kWp 41.1 kg/kWp -10.9 kg/kWp for JAT54S41-470/LR
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 25 yrs +13 yrs for JAT54S41-470/LR
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 108 24 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#517 vs #716
JAM66D46-735/LB leads by 199 places
Power density
#582 vs #674
JAM66D46-735/LB leads by 92 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #511
JAT54S41-470/LR leads by 1,654 places
Weight
#5,413 vs #170
JAT54S41-470/LR leads by 5,243 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#233 vs #4,126
JAM66D46-735/LB leads by 3,893 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-730/LB
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-725/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-720/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-715/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-710/LB
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB or JA Solar JAT54S41-470/LR?
According to our database: JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB has higher module efficiency (23.70% vs 23.50%); JA Solar JAT54S41-470/LR tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB and JA Solar JAT54S41-470/LR?
JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB has a module efficiency of 23.70%, while JA Solar JAT54S41-470/LR is 23.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB use vs JA Solar JAT54S41-470/LR?
JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB uses TOPCon cells; JA Solar JAT54S41-470/LR uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB and JA Solar JAT54S41-470/LR?
JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB has a 30 years power warranty; JA Solar JAT54S41-470/LR has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB and JA Solar JAT54S41-470/LR bifacial panels?
JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB is bifacial (captures light from both faces); JA Solar JAT54S41-470/LR is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 389 JA Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.