Skip to main content
JAM66D46-735/LB vs JAM54D40-475/LR 6 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB vs JA Solar JAM54D40-475/LR

JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB
JAM66D46-735/LB
735 Wp 23.70 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
JA Solar JAM54D40-475/LR
JAM54D40-475/LR
475 Wp 23.80 % N-type
The verdict

JAM54D40-475/LR leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 260 W more power. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
6 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

13 of 19 parameters
Parameter JAM66D46-735/LB JAM54D40-475/LR Difference
Rated power 735 Wp 475 Wp 260 W more power
Weight 38.2 kg 22.0 kg 16.2 kg lighter
Product warranty 12 yrs 15 yrs 3 yrs longer
Weight per kWp 52.0 kg/kWp 46.3 kg/kWp 5.7 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage 49.60 V 40.55 V 9.05 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.70 A 14.67 A 4.03 A apart
Module area 3.106 m² 1.998 m² 1.108 m² apart
Cell technology TOPCon N-type TOPCon vs N-type
Voltage at max power 41.77 V 34.18 V 7.59 V apart
Current at max power 17.60 A 13.90 A 3.70 A apart
Cell count 132 108 24 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JAM66D46-735/LB
24,661 kWh
JAM54D40-475/LR
15,937 kWh
Lifetime gap
8,724 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JAM66D46-735/LB JAM54D40-475/LR
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 735 W 475 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 703 W 454 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 671 W 434 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 639 W 413 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JAM66D46-735/LB JAM54D40-475/LR Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 735 Wp 475 Wp +260 W for JAM66D46-735/LB
Module efficiency 23.70 % 23.80 % Effectively the same
Power density 236.6 Wp/m² 237.7 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 49.60 V 40.55 V 9.05 V apart
Voltage at max power 41.77 V 34.18 V 7.59 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.70 A 14.67 A 4.03 A apart
Current at max power 17.60 A 13.90 A 3.70 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 1.998 m² 1.108 m² apart
Weight 38.2 kg 22.0 kg -16.2 kg for JAM54D40-475/LR
Weight per kWp 52.0 kg/kWp 46.3 kg/kWp -5.7 kg/kWp for JAM54D40-475/LR
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 15 yrs +3 yrs for JAM54D40-475/LR
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon N-type TOPCon vs N-type
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 108 24 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#517 vs #433
JAM54D40-475/LR leads by 84 places
Power density
#582 vs #467
JAM54D40-475/LR leads by 115 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,413 vs #1,117
JAM54D40-475/LR leads by 4,296 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#233 vs #5,786
JAM66D46-735/LB leads by 5,553 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-730/LB
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-725/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-720/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-715/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-710/LB
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB or JA Solar JAM54D40-475/LR?
According to our database: JA Solar JAM54D40-475/LR has higher module efficiency (23.80% vs 23.70%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB and JA Solar JAM54D40-475/LR?
JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB has a module efficiency of 23.70%, while JA Solar JAM54D40-475/LR is 23.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB use vs JA Solar JAM54D40-475/LR?
JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB uses TOPCon cells; JA Solar JAM54D40-475/LR uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB and JA Solar JAM54D40-475/LR?
JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB has a 30 years power warranty; JA Solar JAM54D40-475/LR has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB and JA Solar JAM54D40-475/LR bifacial panels?
JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB is bifacial (captures light from both faces); JA Solar JAM54D40-475/LR is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 391 JA Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.