Skip to main content
JAM66D45-650/LB vs JAM66D46-710/LB 9 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

JA Solar JAM66D45-650/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-710/LB

JA Solar JAM66D45-650/LB
JAM66D45-650/LB
650 Wp 24.10 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
JA Solar JAM66D46-710/LB
JAM66D46-710/LB
710 Wp 22.90 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

JAM66D45-650/LB leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.20 pp more efficient. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 10 differences
How alike are they
9 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

10 of 19 parameters
Parameter JAM66D45-650/LB JAM66D46-710/LB Difference
Module efficiency 24.10 % 22.90 % 1.20 pp more efficient
Rated power 650 Wp 710 Wp 60 W more power
Power density 240.6 Wp/m² 228.6 Wp/m² 12.1 Wp/m² higher
Weight 33.1 kg 38.2 kg 5.1 kg lighter
Module area 2.701 m² 3.106 m² 0.405 m² apart
Weight per kWp 50.9 kg/kWp 53.8 kg/kWp 2.9 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage 49.97 V 48.16 V 1.81 V apart
Current at max power 16.30 A 17.32 A 1.02 A apart
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Voltage at max power 41.67 V 40.40 V 1.27 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JAM66D45-650/LB
21,809 kWh
JAM66D46-710/LB
23,822 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,013 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JAM66D45-650/LB JAM66D46-710/LB
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 650 W 710 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 622 W 679 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 593 W 648 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 565 W 617 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JAM66D45-650/LB JAM66D46-710/LB Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 650 Wp 710 Wp +60 W for JAM66D46-710/LB
Module efficiency 24.10 % 22.90 % +1.20 pp for JAM66D45-650/LB
Power density 240.6 Wp/m² 228.6 Wp/m² +12.1 Wp/m² for JAM66D45-650/LB
Open-circuit voltage 49.97 V 48.16 V 1.81 V apart
Voltage at max power 41.67 V 40.40 V 1.27 V apart
Short-circuit current 17.99 A 18.47 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 16.30 A 17.32 A 1.02 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 2.701 m² 3.106 m² 0.405 m² apart
Weight 33.1 kg 38.2 kg -5.1 kg for JAM66D45-650/LB
Weight per kWp 50.9 kg/kWp 53.8 kg/kWp -2.9 kg/kWp for JAM66D45-650/LB
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#219 vs #2,359
JAM66D45-650/LB leads by 2,140 places
Power density
#233 vs #2,474
JAM66D45-650/LB leads by 2,241 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,300 vs #7,882
JAM66D45-650/LB leads by 3,582 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,158 vs #817
JAM66D46-710/LB leads by 341 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-650/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-650/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-650/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-730/LB
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-650/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-725/LB
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-650/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-720/LB
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-650/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-715/LB
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM66D45-650/LB or JA Solar JAM66D46-710/LB?
According to our database: JA Solar JAM66D45-650/LB has higher module efficiency (24.10% vs 22.90%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM66D45-650/LB and JA Solar JAM66D46-710/LB?
JA Solar JAM66D45-650/LB has a module efficiency of 24.10%, while JA Solar JAM66D46-710/LB is 22.90%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar JAM66D45-650/LB use vs JA Solar JAM66D46-710/LB?
JA Solar JAM66D45-650/LB uses TOPCon cells; JA Solar JAM66D46-710/LB uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM66D45-650/LB and JA Solar JAM66D46-710/LB?
JA Solar JAM66D45-650/LB has a 30 years power warranty; JA Solar JAM66D46-710/LB has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are JA Solar JAM66D45-650/LB and JA Solar JAM66D46-710/LB bifacial panels?
Both JA Solar JAM66D45-650/LB and JA Solar JAM66D46-710/LB are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 393 JA Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.