JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB vs JA Solar JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V
VS
The verdict
JAM66D45-620/LB leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.30 pp more efficient. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
5
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
14 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JAM66D45-620/LB
JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V
Difference
Module efficiency
23.00 %
21.70 %
1.30 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
0.060 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
620 Wp
575 Wp
45 W more power
Power density
229.5 Wp/m²
217.3 Wp/m²
12.2 Wp/m² higher
Short-circuit current
16.13 A
14.44 A
1.69 A apart
Module area
2.701 m²
2.646 m²
0.056 m² apart
Cell technology
TOPCon
PERC
TOPCon vs PERC
Open-circuit voltage
48.50 V
50.86 V
2.36 V apart
Weight per kWp
53.4 kg/kWp
56.5 kg/kWp
3.1 kg/kWp lighter
Cell count
132
144
12 cells apart
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.45 %/yr
0.05 %/yr slower
Current at max power
15.42 A
13.67 A
1.75 A apart
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2333x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 2333x1134x30 mm
Voltage at max power
40.21 V
42.05 V
1.84 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
JAM66D45-620/LB
20,802 kWh
JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V
18,935 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,867 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JAM66D45-620/LB
JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
620 W
575 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.8% of rated power
593 W
545 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.5% of rated power
566 W
515 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.2% of rated power
539 W
484 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JAM66D45-620/LB
JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
620 Wp
575 Wp
+45 W for JAM66D45-620/LB
Module efficiency
23.00 %
21.70 %
+1.30 pp for JAM66D45-620/LB
Power density
229.5 Wp/m²
217.3 Wp/m²
+12.2 Wp/m² for JAM66D45-620/LB
Open-circuit voltage
48.50 V
50.86 V
2.36 V apart
Voltage at max power
40.21 V
42.05 V
1.84 V apart
Short-circuit current
16.13 A
14.44 A
1.69 A apart
Current at max power
15.42 A
13.67 A
1.75 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
+0.060 %/°C for JAM66D45-620/LB
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2333x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 2333x1134x30 mm
Module area
2.701 m²
2.646 m²
0.056 m² apart
Weight
33.1 kg
32.5 kg
Effectively the same
Weight per kWp
53.4 kg/kWp
56.5 kg/kWp
-3.1 kg/kWp for JAM66D45-620/LB
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.45 %/yr
-0.05 %/yr for JAM66D45-620/LB
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
PERC
TOPCon vs PERC
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
144
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,919
vs
#7,421
JAM66D45-620/LB leads by 5,502 places
Power density
#2,191
vs
#7,324
JAM66D45-620/LB leads by 5,133 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#10,419
JAM66D45-620/LB leads by 8,254 places
Weight
#7,289
vs
#10,695
JAM66D45-620/LB leads by 3,406 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,537
vs
#5,574
JAM66D45-620/LB leads by 3,037 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-630/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-625/LB
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-615/LB
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-605/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB vs JA Solar JAM72D30-580/LB/1500V
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB or JA Solar JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V?
According to our database: JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 21.70%); JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB and JA Solar JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V?
JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB has a module efficiency of 23.00%, while JA Solar JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V is 21.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB use vs JA Solar JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V?
JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB uses TOPCon cells; JA Solar JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB and JA Solar JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V?
JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB has a 30 years power warranty; JA Solar JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB and JA Solar JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V bifacial panels?
Both JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB and JA Solar JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 394 JA Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
