Skip to main content
JAM66D45-620/LB vs JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V 5 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB vs JA Solar JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V

JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB
JAM66D45-620/LB
620 Wp 23.00 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V
575 Wp 21.70 % PERC Bifacial
The verdict

JAM66D45-620/LB leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.30 pp more efficient. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 14 differences
How alike are they
5 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

14 of 19 parameters
Parameter JAM66D45-620/LB JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V Difference
Module efficiency 23.00 % 21.70 % 1.30 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.350 %/°C 0.060 %/°C better in heat
Rated power 620 Wp 575 Wp 45 W more power
Power density 229.5 Wp/m² 217.3 Wp/m² 12.2 Wp/m² higher
Short-circuit current 16.13 A 14.44 A 1.69 A apart
Module area 2.701 m² 2.646 m² 0.056 m² apart
Cell technology TOPCon PERC TOPCon vs PERC
Open-circuit voltage 48.50 V 50.86 V 2.36 V apart
Weight per kWp 53.4 kg/kWp 56.5 kg/kWp 3.1 kg/kWp lighter
Cell count 132 144 12 cells apart
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.45 %/yr 0.05 %/yr slower
Current at max power 15.42 A 13.67 A 1.75 A apart
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2333x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2333x1134x30 mm
Voltage at max power 40.21 V 42.05 V 1.84 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
JAM66D45-620/LB
20,802 kWh
JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V
18,935 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,867 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JAM66D45-620/LB JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 620 W 575 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.8% of rated power 593 W 545 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.5% of rated power 566 W 515 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.2% of rated power 539 W 484 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JAM66D45-620/LB JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 620 Wp 575 Wp +45 W for JAM66D45-620/LB
Module efficiency 23.00 % 21.70 % +1.30 pp for JAM66D45-620/LB
Power density 229.5 Wp/m² 217.3 Wp/m² +12.2 Wp/m² for JAM66D45-620/LB
Open-circuit voltage 48.50 V 50.86 V 2.36 V apart
Voltage at max power 40.21 V 42.05 V 1.84 V apart
Short-circuit current 16.13 A 14.44 A 1.69 A apart
Current at max power 15.42 A 13.67 A 1.75 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.350 %/°C +0.060 %/°C for JAM66D45-620/LB
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2333x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2333x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.701 m² 2.646 m² 0.056 m² apart
Weight 33.1 kg 32.5 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 53.4 kg/kWp 56.5 kg/kWp -3.1 kg/kWp for JAM66D45-620/LB
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.45 %/yr -0.05 %/yr for JAM66D45-620/LB
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon PERC TOPCon vs PERC
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 144 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,919 vs #7,421
JAM66D45-620/LB leads by 5,502 places
Power density
#2,191 vs #7,324
JAM66D45-620/LB leads by 5,133 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #10,419
JAM66D45-620/LB leads by 8,254 places
Weight
#7,289 vs #10,695
JAM66D45-620/LB leads by 3,406 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,537 vs #5,574
JAM66D45-620/LB leads by 3,037 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-630/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-625/LB
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-615/LB
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-605/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB vs JA Solar JAM72D30-580/LB/1500V
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB or JA Solar JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V?
According to our database: JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 21.70%); JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB and JA Solar JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V?
JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB has a module efficiency of 23.00%, while JA Solar JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V is 21.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB use vs JA Solar JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V?
JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB uses TOPCon cells; JA Solar JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB and JA Solar JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V?
JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB has a 30 years power warranty; JA Solar JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB and JA Solar JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V bifacial panels?
Both JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB and JA Solar JAM72D30-575/LB/1500V are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 394 JA Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.