JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB vs JA Solar JAM72D30-550/GB/1500V
VS
The verdict
JAM66D45-610/LB leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.30 pp more efficient. 4 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 15 differencesHow alike are they
4
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
15 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JAM66D45-610/LB
JAM72D30-550/GB/1500V
Difference
Module efficiency
22.60 %
21.30 %
1.30 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
0.060 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
610 Wp
550 Wp
60 W more power
Power density
225.8 Wp/m²
212.9 Wp/m²
12.9 Wp/m² higher
Short-circuit current
16.05 A
14.00 A
2.05 A apart
Module area
2.701 m²
2.583 m²
0.118 m² apart
Weight per kWp
54.3 kg/kWp
57.8 kg/kWp
3.6 kg/kWp lighter
Cell technology
TOPCon
PERC
TOPCon vs PERC
Current at max power
15.34 A
13.11 A
2.23 A apart
Cell count
132
144
12 cells apart
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.45 %/yr
0.05 %/yr slower
Weight
33.1 kg
31.8 kg
1.3 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage
48.10 V
49.90 V
1.80 V apart
Voltage at max power
39.77 V
41.96 V
2.19 V apart
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2278x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
JAM66D45-610/LB
20,467 kWh
JAM72D30-550/GB/1500V
18,112 kWh
Lifetime gap
2,355 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JAM66D45-610/LB
JAM72D30-550/GB/1500V
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
610 W
550 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.8% of rated power
583 W
521 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.5% of rated power
557 W
492 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.2% of rated power
530 W
463 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JAM66D45-610/LB
JAM72D30-550/GB/1500V
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
610 Wp
550 Wp
+60 W for JAM66D45-610/LB
Module efficiency
22.60 %
21.30 %
+1.30 pp for JAM66D45-610/LB
Power density
225.8 Wp/m²
212.9 Wp/m²
+12.9 Wp/m² for JAM66D45-610/LB
Open-circuit voltage
48.10 V
49.90 V
1.80 V apart
Voltage at max power
39.77 V
41.96 V
2.19 V apart
Short-circuit current
16.05 A
14.00 A
2.05 A apart
Current at max power
15.34 A
13.11 A
2.23 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.350 %/°C
+0.060 %/°C for JAM66D45-610/LB
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2278x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
Module area
2.701 m²
2.583 m²
0.118 m² apart
Weight
33.1 kg
31.8 kg
-1.3 kg for JAM72D30-550/GB/1500V
Weight per kWp
54.3 kg/kWp
57.8 kg/kWp
-3.6 kg/kWp for JAM66D45-610/LB
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.45 %/yr
-0.05 %/yr for JAM66D45-610/LB
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
PERC
TOPCon vs PERC
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
144
12 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#3,716
vs
#8,585
JAM66D45-610/LB leads by 4,869 places
Power density
#3,788
vs
#8,563
JAM66D45-610/LB leads by 4,775 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220
vs
#10,489
JAM66D45-610/LB leads by 8,269 places
Weight
#8,595
vs
#11,526
JAM66D45-610/LB leads by 2,931 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,331
vs
#7,043
JAM66D45-610/LB leads by 3,712 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-630/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-625/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-615/LB
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-605/LB
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB vs JA Solar JAM72D30-580/LB/1500V
13 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB or JA Solar JAM72D30-550/GB/1500V?
According to our database: JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB has higher module efficiency (22.60% vs 21.30%); JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB and JA Solar JAM72D30-550/GB/1500V?
JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB has a module efficiency of 22.60%, while JA Solar JAM72D30-550/GB/1500V is 21.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB use vs JA Solar JAM72D30-550/GB/1500V?
JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB uses TOPCon cells; JA Solar JAM72D30-550/GB/1500V uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB and JA Solar JAM72D30-550/GB/1500V?
JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB has a 30 years power warranty; JA Solar JAM72D30-550/GB/1500V has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB and JA Solar JAM72D30-550/GB/1500V bifacial panels?
Both JA Solar JAM66D45-610/LB and JA Solar JAM72D30-550/GB/1500V are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 328 JA Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
