JA Solar JAM66D42-595/MB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB
VS
The verdict
JAM66D46-740/LB leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.80 pp more efficient. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 9 differencesHow alike are they
10
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
9 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JAM66D42-595/MB
JAM66D46-740/LB
Difference
Module efficiency
23.00 %
23.80 %
0.80 pp more efficient
Rated power
595 Wp
740 Wp
145 W more power
Weight
31.8 kg
38.2 kg
6.4 kg lighter
Power density
230.3 Wp/m²
238.2 Wp/m²
7.9 Wp/m² higher
Short-circuit current
15.36 A
18.73 A
3.37 A apart
Module area
2.583 m²
3.106 m²
0.523 m² apart
Current at max power
14.50 A
17.64 A
3.14 A apart
Open-circuit voltage
48.78 V
49.80 V
1.02 V apart
Dimensions
2278x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2278x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JAM66D42-595/MB
19,963 kWh
JAM66D46-740/LB
24,828 kWh
Lifetime gap
4,865 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JAM66D42-595/MB
JAM66D46-740/LB
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
595 W
740 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
569 W
708 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
543 W
676 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
517 W
643 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JAM66D42-595/MB
JAM66D46-740/LB
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
595 Wp
740 Wp
+145 W for JAM66D46-740/LB
Module efficiency
23.00 %
23.80 %
+0.80 pp for JAM66D46-740/LB
Power density
230.3 Wp/m²
238.2 Wp/m²
+7.9 Wp/m² for JAM66D46-740/LB
Open-circuit voltage
48.78 V
49.80 V
1.02 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.03 V
41.96 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
15.36 A
18.73 A
3.37 A apart
Current at max power
14.50 A
17.64 A
3.14 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2278x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2278x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
2.583 m²
3.106 m²
0.523 m² apart
Weight
31.8 kg
38.2 kg
-6.4 kg for JAM66D42-595/MB
Weight per kWp
53.4 kg/kWp
51.6 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,970
vs
#462
JAM66D46-740/LB leads by 1,508 places
Power density
#1,809
vs
#460
JAM66D46-740/LB leads by 1,349 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220
vs
#2,220
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,445
vs
#5,026
JAM66D46-740/LB leads by 2,419 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,414
vs
#185
JAM66D46-740/LB leads by 3,229 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D42-595/MB vs JA Solar JAM66D42-605/MB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D42-595/MB vs JA Solar JAM66D42-600/MB
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D42-595/MB vs JA Solar JAM66D42-590/MB
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D42-595/MB vs JA Solar JAM66D42-585/MB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D42-595/MB vs JA Solar JAM66D42-580/MB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM66D42-595/MB or JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB?
According to our database: JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB has higher module efficiency (23.80% vs 23.00%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM66D42-595/MB and JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB?
JA Solar JAM66D42-595/MB has a module efficiency of 23.00%, while JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB is 23.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar JAM66D42-595/MB use vs JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB?
JA Solar JAM66D42-595/MB uses TOPCon cells; JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM66D42-595/MB and JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB?
JA Solar JAM66D42-595/MB has a 30 years power warranty; JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are JA Solar JAM66D42-595/MB and JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB bifacial panels?
Both JA Solar JAM66D42-595/MB and JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 327 JA Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.