Skip to main content
385/MR vs 395/MR 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

JA Solar JAM54S31-385/MR vs JA Solar JAM54S31-395/MR

JA Solar JAM54S31-385/MR
JAM54S31-385/MR
385 Wp 19.70 % PERC
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
JA Solar JAM54S31-395/MR
JAM54S31-395/MR
395 Wp 20.20 % PERC
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

395/MR leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.50 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter 385/MR 395/MR Difference
Module efficiency 19.70 % 20.20 % 0.50 pp more efficient
Power density 197.2 Wp/m² 202.3 Wp/m² 5.1 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 385 Wp 395 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.350 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
385/MR
12,477 kWh
395/MR
12,802 kWh
Lifetime gap
325 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 385/MR 395/MR
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 385 W 395 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.8% of rated power 365 W 374 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.5% of rated power 345 W 354 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.2% of rated power 324 W 333 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 385/MR 395/MR Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 385 Wp 395 Wp +10 W for 395/MR
Module efficiency 19.70 % 20.20 % +0.50 pp for 395/MR
Power density 197.2 Wp/m² 202.3 Wp/m² +5.1 Wp/m² for 395/MR
Open-circuit voltage 36.71 V 36.98 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 30.46 V 30.84 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 13.52 A 13.70 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 12.64 A 12.81 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.350 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1722x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 1.953 m² 1.953 m² Same
Weight 19.5 kg 19.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 50.6 kg/kWp 49.4 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.55 %/yr 0.55 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#12,511 vs #11,956
395/MR leads by 555 places
Power density
#12,493 vs #11,887
395/MR leads by 606 places
Heat behaviour
#10,419 vs #10,419
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#4,091 vs #2,878
395/MR leads by 1,213 places
Warranty
#9,798 vs #9,798
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#12,528 vs #12,239
395/MR leads by 289 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54S31-385/MR vs JA Solar JAM54S31-405/MR
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54S31-385/MR vs JA Solar JAM54S31-400/MR
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54S31-385/MR vs JA Solar JAM54S31-390/MR
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54S31-385/MR vs JA Solar JAM54S31-380/MR
One difference: module efficiency
Same manufacturer
JA Solar JAM54S31-385/MR vs JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB
16 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
JA Solar JAM54S31-385/MR vs JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB
16 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM54S31-385/MR or JA Solar JAM54S31-395/MR?
According to our database: JA Solar JAM54S31-395/MR has higher module efficiency (20.20% vs 19.70%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM54S31-385/MR and JA Solar JAM54S31-395/MR?
JA Solar JAM54S31-385/MR has a module efficiency of 19.70%, while JA Solar JAM54S31-395/MR is 20.20%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar JAM54S31-385/MR use vs JA Solar JAM54S31-395/MR?
JA Solar JAM54S31-385/MR uses PERC cells; JA Solar JAM54S31-395/MR uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM54S31-385/MR and JA Solar JAM54S31-395/MR?
JA Solar JAM54S31-385/MR has a 25 years power warranty; JA Solar JAM54S31-395/MR has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Shop prices: See 389 JA Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.