Skip to main content
JAM54D41-450/LR vs JAM66D45-625/LB 5 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

JA Solar JAM54D41-450/LR vs JA Solar JAM66D45-625/LB

JA Solar JAM54D41-450/LR
JAM54D41-450/LR
450 Wp 22.50 % TOPCon
VS
JA Solar JAM66D45-625/LB
JAM66D45-625/LB
625 Wp 23.10 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

14 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is rated power: 175 W more power. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 14 differences
How alike are they
5 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

14 of 19 parameters
Parameter JAM54D41-450/LR JAM66D45-625/LB Difference
Rated power 450 Wp 625 Wp 175 W more power
Module efficiency 22.50 % 23.10 % 0.60 pp more efficient
Weight 22.0 kg 33.1 kg 11.1 kg lighter
Product warranty 15 yrs 12 yrs 3 yrs longer
Power density 225.2 Wp/m² 231.4 Wp/m² 6.2 Wp/m² higher
Open-circuit voltage 40.30 V 48.70 V 8.40 V apart
Module area 1.998 m² 2.701 m² 0.703 m² apart
Short-circuit current 14.41 A 16.15 A 1.74 A apart
Weight per kWp 48.9 kg/kWp 53.0 kg/kWp 4.1 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power 32.99 V 40.45 V 7.46 V apart
Cell count 108 132 24 cells apart
Current at max power 13.64 A 15.45 A 1.81 A apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JAM54D41-450/LR
15,098 kWh
JAM66D45-625/LB
20,970 kWh
Lifetime gap
5,872 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JAM54D41-450/LR JAM66D45-625/LB
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 450 W 625 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 430 W 598 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 411 W 571 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 391 W 543 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JAM54D41-450/LR JAM66D45-625/LB Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 450 Wp 625 Wp +175 W for JAM66D45-625/LB
Module efficiency 22.50 % 23.10 % +0.60 pp for JAM66D45-625/LB
Power density 225.2 Wp/m² 231.4 Wp/m² +6.2 Wp/m² for JAM66D45-625/LB
Open-circuit voltage 40.30 V 48.70 V 8.40 V apart
Voltage at max power 32.99 V 40.45 V 7.46 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.41 A 16.15 A 1.74 A apart
Current at max power 13.64 A 15.45 A 1.81 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area 1.998 m² 2.701 m² 0.703 m² apart
Weight 22.0 kg 33.1 kg -11.1 kg for JAM54D41-450/LR
Weight per kWp 48.9 kg/kWp 53.0 kg/kWp -4.1 kg/kWp for JAM54D41-450/LR
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 12 yrs +3 yrs for JAM54D41-450/LR
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 132 24 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#4,222 vs #1,570
JAM66D45-625/LB leads by 2,652 places
Power density
#4,225 vs #1,513
JAM66D45-625/LB leads by 2,712 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#2,563 vs #6,680
JAM54D41-450/LR leads by 4,117 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#8,397 vs #2,270
JAM66D45-625/LB leads by 6,127 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D41-450/LR vs JA Solar JAM54D41-455/LR
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D41-450/LR vs JA Solar JAM54D41-445/LR
2 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D41-450/LR vs JA Solar JAM54D41-440/LR
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-625/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-630/LB
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-625/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-620/LB
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D45-625/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D45-615/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM54D41-450/LR or JA Solar JAM66D45-625/LB?
According to our database: JA Solar JAM66D45-625/LB has higher module efficiency (23.10% vs 22.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM54D41-450/LR and JA Solar JAM66D45-625/LB?
JA Solar JAM54D41-450/LR has a module efficiency of 22.50%, while JA Solar JAM66D45-625/LB is 23.10%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar JAM54D41-450/LR use vs JA Solar JAM66D45-625/LB?
JA Solar JAM54D41-450/LR uses TOPCon cells; JA Solar JAM66D45-625/LB uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM54D41-450/LR and JA Solar JAM66D45-625/LB?
JA Solar JAM54D41-450/LR has a 30 years power warranty; JA Solar JAM66D45-625/LB has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are JA Solar JAM54D41-450/LR and JA Solar JAM66D45-625/LB bifacial panels?
JA Solar JAM66D45-625/LB is bifacial (captures light from both faces); JA Solar JAM54D41-450/LR is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 394 JA Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.