JA Solar JAM54D41-445/LR vs JA Solar JAM66D46-725/LB
VS
The verdict
JAM66D46-725/LB leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.00 pp more efficient. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
5
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
14 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JAM54D41-445/LR
JAM66D46-725/LB
Difference
Module efficiency
22.30 %
23.30 %
1.00 pp more efficient
Rated power
445 Wp
725 Wp
280 W more power
Power density
222.7 Wp/m²
233.4 Wp/m²
10.7 Wp/m² higher
Weight
22.0 kg
38.2 kg
16.2 kg lighter
Product warranty
15 yrs
12 yrs
3 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage
39.10 V
49.20 V
10.10 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.40 A
18.63 A
4.23 A apart
Module area
1.998 m²
3.106 m²
1.108 m² apart
Weight per kWp
49.4 kg/kWp
52.7 kg/kWp
3.3 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power
32.65 V
41.39 V
8.74 V apart
Current at max power
13.63 A
17.52 A
3.89 A apart
Cell count
108
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JAM54D41-445/LR
14,931 kWh
JAM66D46-725/LB
24,325 kWh
Lifetime gap
9,394 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JAM54D41-445/LR
JAM66D46-725/LB
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
445 W
725 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
426 W
693 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
406 W
662 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
387 W
630 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JAM54D41-445/LR
JAM66D46-725/LB
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
445 Wp
725 Wp
+280 W for JAM66D46-725/LB
Module efficiency
22.30 %
23.30 %
+1.00 pp for JAM66D46-725/LB
Power density
222.7 Wp/m²
233.4 Wp/m²
+10.7 Wp/m² for JAM66D46-725/LB
Open-circuit voltage
39.10 V
49.20 V
10.10 V apart
Voltage at max power
32.65 V
41.39 V
8.74 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.40 A
18.63 A
4.23 A apart
Current at max power
13.63 A
17.52 A
3.89 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
1.998 m²
3.106 m²
1.108 m² apart
Weight
22.0 kg
38.2 kg
-16.2 kg for JAM54D41-445/LR
Weight per kWp
49.4 kg/kWp
52.7 kg/kWp
-3.3 kg/kWp for JAM54D41-445/LR
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
12 yrs
+3 yrs for JAM54D41-445/LR
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
132
24 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#5,100
vs
#1,017
JAM66D46-725/LB leads by 4,083 places
Power density
#5,302
vs
#936
JAM66D46-725/LB leads by 4,366 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#2,959
vs
#6,337
JAM54D41-445/LR leads by 3,378 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#8,801
vs
#424
JAM66D46-725/LB leads by 8,377 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D41-445/LR vs JA Solar JAM54D41-455/LR
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D41-445/LR vs JA Solar JAM54D41-450/LR
2 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D41-445/LR vs JA Solar JAM54D41-440/LR
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D46-725/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-740/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D46-725/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-735/LB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM66D46-725/LB vs JA Solar JAM66D46-730/LB
One difference: module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM54D41-445/LR or JA Solar JAM66D46-725/LB?
According to our database: JA Solar JAM66D46-725/LB has higher module efficiency (23.30% vs 22.30%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM54D41-445/LR and JA Solar JAM66D46-725/LB?
JA Solar JAM54D41-445/LR has a module efficiency of 22.30%, while JA Solar JAM66D46-725/LB is 23.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar JAM54D41-445/LR use vs JA Solar JAM66D46-725/LB?
JA Solar JAM54D41-445/LR uses TOPCon cells; JA Solar JAM66D46-725/LB uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM54D41-445/LR and JA Solar JAM66D46-725/LB?
JA Solar JAM54D41-445/LR has a 30 years power warranty; JA Solar JAM66D46-725/LB has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are JA Solar JAM54D41-445/LR and JA Solar JAM66D46-725/LB bifacial panels?
JA Solar JAM66D46-725/LB is bifacial (captures light from both faces); JA Solar JAM54D41-445/LR is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 351 JA Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.