JA Solar JAM54D40-460/LR vs Jinko Solar JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU
VS
The verdict
JAM54D40-460/LR leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.27 pp more efficient. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 10 differencesHow alike are they
9
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
10 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
JAM54D40-460/LR
JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU
Difference
Module efficiency
23.00 %
23.27 %
0.27 pp more efficient
Open-circuit voltage
39.70 V
36.70 V
3.00 V apart
Weight
22.0 kg
24.0 kg
2.0 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
47.8 kg/kWp
51.6 kg/kWp
3.8 kg/kWp lighter
Cell technology
N-type
TOPCon
N-type vs TOPCon
Short-circuit current
14.64 A
15.80 A
1.16 A apart
Cell count
108
96
12 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Current at max power
13.87 A
14.89 A
1.02 A apart
Voltage at max power
33.17 V
31.23 V
1.94 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
JAM54D40-460/LR
15,434 kWh
JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU
15,602 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
JAM54D40-460/LR
JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
460 W
465 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
440 W
445 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
420 W
425 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
400 W
404 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
JAM54D40-460/LR
JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
460 Wp
465 Wp
Effectively the same
Module efficiency
23.00 %
23.27 %
+0.27 pp for JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU
Power density
230.2 Wp/m²
232.7 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
39.70 V
36.70 V
3.00 V apart
Voltage at max power
33.17 V
31.23 V
1.94 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.64 A
15.80 A
1.16 A apart
Current at max power
13.87 A
14.89 A
1.02 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
Same
Module area
1.998 m²
1.998 m²
Same
Weight
22.0 kg
24.0 kg
-2.0 kg for JAM54D40-460/LR
Weight per kWp
47.8 kg/kWp
51.6 kg/kWp
-3.8 kg/kWp for JAM54D40-460/LR
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
TOPCon
N-type vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
96
12 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,919
vs
#1,202
JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU leads by 717 places
Power density
#1,876
vs
#1,115
JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU leads by 761 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#1,924
vs
#4,981
JAM54D40-460/LR leads by 3,057 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#7,344
vs
#6,892
JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU leads by 452 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D40-460/LR vs JA Solar JAM54D40-475/LR
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D40-460/LR vs JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D40-460/LR vs JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D40-460/LR vs JA Solar JAM54S40-460/LR
3 differences, the largest is weight per kwp
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D40-460/LR vs JA Solar JAM54S40-455/LR
4 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D40-460/LR vs JA Solar JAM54D41-455/LR
2 differences, the largest is cell technology
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: JA Solar JAM54D40-460/LR or Jinko Solar JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU has higher module efficiency (23.27% vs 23.00%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of JA Solar JAM54D40-460/LR and Jinko Solar JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU?
JA Solar JAM54D40-460/LR has a module efficiency of 23.00%, while Jinko Solar JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU is 23.27%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does JA Solar JAM54D40-460/LR use vs Jinko Solar JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU?
JA Solar JAM54D40-460/LR uses N-type cells; Jinko Solar JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on JA Solar JAM54D40-460/LR and Jinko Solar JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU?
JA Solar JAM54D40-460/LR has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are JA Solar JAM54D40-460/LR and Jinko Solar JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU bifacial panels?
Jinko Solar JKM465N-48HL4M-BDV-Z2-EU is bifacial (captures light from both faces); JA Solar JAM54D40-460/LR is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 356 JA Solar offers · See 162 Jinko Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.