Skip to main content
YH720W-33MHD/MH vs MS725N-HJTGB 13 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH vs MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB

IBC Solar
YH720W-33MHD/MH
720 Wp 23.18 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
VS
MY Solar
MS725N-HJTGB
725 Wp 23.34 % HJT Bifacial Incomplete
The verdict

MS725N-HJTGB leads on the differences that matter

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.110 %/°C better in heat. 13 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 5 differences
How alike are they
13 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

5 of 18 parameters
Parameter YH720W-33MHD/MH MS725N-HJTGB Difference
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.240 %/°C 0.110 %/°C better in heat
Cell technology TOPCon HJT TOPCon vs HJT
Open-circuit voltage 49.82 V 50.90 V 1.08 V apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Voltage at max power 41.52 V 42.85 V 1.33 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
YH720W-33MHD/MH
24,157 kWh
MS725N-HJTGB
24,325 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario YH720W-33MHD/MH MS725N-HJTGB
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 720 W 725 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.8% of rated power 682 W 699 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.5% of rated power 644 W 673 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.2% of rated power 607 W 647 W
03

Full specification

Parameter YH720W-33MHD/MH MS725N-HJTGB Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 720 Wp 725 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 23.18 % 23.34 % Effectively the same
Power density 231.8 Wp/m² 233.4 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 49.82 V 50.90 V 1.08 V apart
Voltage at max power 41.52 V 42.85 V 1.33 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.13 A 17.74 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.34 A 16.93 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.240 %/°C +0.110 %/°C for MS725N-HJTGB
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.0 kg 38.3 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 52.8 kg/kWp 52.8 kg/kWp Same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon HJT TOPCon vs HJT
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,424 vs #943
MS725N-HJTGB leads by 481 places
Power density
#1,347 vs #936
MS725N-HJTGB leads by 411 places
Heat behaviour
#10,419 vs #13
MS725N-HJTGB leads by 10,406 places
Weight
#6,459 vs #6,514
YH720W-33MHD/MH leads by 55 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#24 vs #13
MS725N-HJTGB leads by 11 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
IBC Solar
IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH vs IBC Solar YH715W-33MHD/MH
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
IBC Solar
IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH vs IBC Solar YH710W-33MHD/MH
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
MY Solar
MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB vs MY Solar MS740N-HJTGB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
MY Solar
MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB vs MY Solar MS735N-HJTGB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
MY Solar
MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB vs MY Solar MS730N-HJTGB
The same specification on paper
Same manufacturer
IBC Solar
IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH vs IBC Solar YH550W-36MH
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH or MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB?
According to our database: MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB has higher module efficiency (23.34% vs 23.18%); MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH and MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB?
IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH has a module efficiency of 23.18%, while MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB is 23.34%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH use vs MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB?
IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH uses TOPCon cells; MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH and MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB?
IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH has a 30 years power warranty; MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH and MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB bifacial panels?
Both IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH and MY Solar MS725N-HJTGB are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Compare IBC Solar and MY Solar as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 2 IBC Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.