IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH vs AE Solar AE CME-132 720
VS
The verdict
AE CME-132 720 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.060 %/°C better in heat. 13 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See all 5 differencesHow alike are they
13
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
5 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
YH720W-33MHD/MH
AE CME-132 720
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.350 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.060 %/°C better in heat
Weight
38.0 kg
31.5 kg
6.5 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
52.8 kg/kWp
43.8 kg/kWp
9.0 kg/kWp lighter
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
YH720W-33MHD/MH
24,157 kWh
AE CME-132 720
24,157 kWh
Lifetime gap
No difference
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
YH720W-33MHD/MH
AE CME-132 720
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
720 W
720 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.8% of rated power
682 W
689 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.5% of rated power
644 W
657 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.2% of rated power
607 W
626 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
YH720W-33MHD/MH
AE CME-132 720
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
720 Wp
720 Wp
Same
Module efficiency
23.18 %
23.21 %
Effectively the same
Power density
231.8 Wp/m²
232.1 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
49.82 V
49.10 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
41.52 V
41.30 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
18.13 A
18.43 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
17.34 A
17.43 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.350 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.060 %/°C for AE CME-132 720
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
3.103 m²
Effectively the same
Weight
38.0 kg
31.5 kg
-6.5 kg for AE CME-132 720
Weight per kWp
52.8 kg/kWp
43.8 kg/kWp
-9.0 kg/kWp for AE CME-132 720
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,424
vs
#1,299
AE CME-132 720 leads by 125 places
Power density
#1,347
vs
#1,339
AE CME-132 720 leads by 8 places
Heat behaviour
#10,419
vs
#2,165
AE CME-132 720 leads by 8,254 places
Weight
#6,459
vs
#336
AE CME-132 720 leads by 6,123 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#24
vs
#19
AE CME-132 720 leads by 5 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
IBC Solar
IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH vs IBC Solar YH715W-33MHD/MH
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
IBC Solar
IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH vs IBC Solar YH710W-33MHD/MH
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132 720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730
6 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132 720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-730W
7 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132 720 vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-725
3 differences, the largest is weight
Same series, other bin
AE Solar AE CME-132 720 vs AE Solar CME-132-725W
One difference: product warranty
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH or AE Solar AE CME-132 720?
According to our database: AE Solar AE CME-132 720 has higher module efficiency (23.21% vs 23.18%); AE Solar AE CME-132 720 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH and AE Solar AE CME-132 720?
IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH has a module efficiency of 23.18%, while AE Solar AE CME-132 720 is 23.21%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH use vs AE Solar AE CME-132 720?
IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH uses TOPCon cells; AE Solar AE CME-132 720 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH and AE Solar AE CME-132 720?
IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar AE CME-132 720 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH and AE Solar AE CME-132 720 bifacial panels?
IBC Solar YH720 W-33MHD/MH is bifacial (captures light from both faces); AE Solar AE CME-132 720 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 2 IBC Solar offers · See 5 AE Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.