Skip to main content
YH210W-21M vs YH715W-33MHD/MH 4 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

IBC Solar YH210W-21M vs IBC Solar YH715W-33MHD/MH

IBC Solar
YH210W-21M
210 Wp 20.35 % PERC Incomplete
VS
IBC Solar
YH715W-33MHD/MH
715 Wp 23.02 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
The verdict

YH715W-33MHD/MH leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 2.67 pp more efficient. 4 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 14 differences
How alike are they
4 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

14 of 18 parameters
Parameter YH210W-21M YH715W-33MHD/MH Difference
Module efficiency 20.35 % 23.02 % 2.67 pp more efficient
Rated power 210 Wp 715 Wp 505 W more power
Power density 203.5 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² 26.7 Wp/m² higher
Weight 10.8 kg 38.0 kg 27.2 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage 28.56 V 49.58 V 21.02 V apart
Short-circuit current 9.01 A 18.09 A 9.08 A apart
Module area 1.032 m² 3.106 m² 2.074 m² apart
Cell technology PERC TOPCon PERC vs TOPCon
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.350 %/°C 0.010 %/°C better in heat
Voltage at max power 24.53 V 41.32 V 16.79 V apart
Current at max power 8.56 A 17.32 A 8.76 A apart
Cell count 42 132 90 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Dimensions 1545x668x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 1545x668x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
YH210W-21M
7,046 kWh
YH715W-33MHD/MH
23,990 kWh
Lifetime gap
16,944 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario YH210W-21M YH715W-33MHD/MH
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 210 W 715 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.8% of rated power 199 W 677 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.5% of rated power 189 W 640 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.2% of rated power 178 W 602 W
03

Full specification

Parameter YH210W-21M YH715W-33MHD/MH Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 210 Wp 715 Wp +505 W for YH715W-33MHD/MH
Module efficiency 20.35 % 23.02 % +2.67 pp for YH715W-33MHD/MH
Power density 203.5 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² +26.7 Wp/m² for YH715W-33MHD/MH
Open-circuit voltage 28.56 V 49.58 V 21.02 V apart
Voltage at max power 24.53 V 41.32 V 16.79 V apart
Short-circuit current 9.01 A 18.09 A 9.08 A apart
Current at max power 8.56 A 17.32 A 8.76 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.350 %/°C +0.010 %/°C for YH210W-21M
Mechanical
Dimensions 1545x668x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 1545x668x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 1.032 m² 3.106 m² 2.074 m² apart
Weight 10.8 kg 38.0 kg -27.2 kg for YH210W-21M
Weight per kWp 51.6 kg/kWp 53.1 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology PERC TOPCon PERC vs TOPCon
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 42 132 90 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#11,718 vs #1,797
YH715W-33MHD/MH leads by 9,921 places
Power density
#11,690 vs #2,018
YH715W-33MHD/MH leads by 9,672 places
Heat behaviour
#8,778 vs #10,419
YH210W-21M leads by 1,641 places
Weight
#4,952 vs #6,946
YH210W-21M leads by 1,994 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#12,491 vs #40
YH715W-33MHD/MH leads by 12,451 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
IBC Solar
IBC Solar YH210W-21M vs IBC Solar YH215W-21M
2 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
IBC Solar
IBC Solar YH210W-21M vs IBC Solar YH205W-21M
2 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
IBC Solar
IBC Solar YH715W-33MHD/MH vs IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
IBC Solar
IBC Solar YH715W-33MHD/MH vs IBC Solar YH710W-33MHD/MH
The same specification on paper
Same manufacturer
IBC Solar
IBC Solar YH210W-21M vs IBC Solar YH550W-36MH
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
IBC Solar
IBC Solar YH210W-21M vs IBC Solar YH545W-36MH
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: IBC Solar YH210W-21M or IBC Solar YH715W-33MHD/MH?
According to our database: IBC Solar YH715 W-33MHD/MH has higher module efficiency (23.02% vs 20.35%); IBC Solar YH210 W-21M tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.340%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of IBC Solar YH210W-21M and IBC Solar YH715W-33MHD/MH?
IBC Solar YH210 W-21M has a module efficiency of 20.35%, while IBC Solar YH715 W-33MHD/MH is 23.02%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does IBC Solar YH210W-21M use vs IBC Solar YH715W-33MHD/MH?
IBC Solar YH210 W-21M uses PERC cells; IBC Solar YH715 W-33MHD/MH uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on IBC Solar YH210W-21M and IBC Solar YH715W-33MHD/MH?
IBC Solar YH210 W-21M has a 30 years power warranty; IBC Solar YH715 W-33MHD/MH has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are IBC Solar YH210W-21M and IBC Solar YH715W-33MHD/MH bifacial panels?
IBC Solar YH715 W-33MHD/MH is bifacial (captures light from both faces); IBC Solar YH210 W-21M is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 2 IBC Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.