IBC Solar Transparent 445 LS-TA2 vs IBC Solar IBC Module Transparent 455 LS-TA2
VS
IBC Solar
IBC Module Transparent 455 LS-TA2
455 Wp
22.80 %
TOPCon
Bifacial
The verdict
IBC Module Transparent 455 LS-TA2 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.50 pp more efficient. 15 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 4 differencesHow alike are they
15
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
4 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
Transparent 445 LS-TA2
IBC Module Transparent 455 LS-TA2
Difference
Module efficiency
22.30 %
22.80 %
0.50 pp more efficient
Power density
222.7 Wp/m²
227.7 Wp/m²
5.0 Wp/m² higher
Cell technology
Back Contact
TOPCon
Back Contact vs TOPCon
Rated power
445 Wp
455 Wp
10 W more power
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
Transparent 445 LS-TA2
14,931 kWh
IBC Module Transparent 455 LS-TA2
15,266 kWh
Lifetime gap
335 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
Transparent 445 LS-TA2
IBC Module Transparent 455 LS-TA2
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
445 W
455 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
426 W
435 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
406 W
415 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
387 W
396 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
Transparent 445 LS-TA2
IBC Module Transparent 455 LS-TA2
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
445 Wp
455 Wp
+10 W for IBC Module Transparent 455 LS-TA2
Module efficiency
22.30 %
22.80 %
+0.50 pp for IBC Module Transparent 455 LS-TA2
Power density
222.7 Wp/m²
227.7 Wp/m²
+5.0 Wp/m² for IBC Module Transparent 455 LS-TA2
Open-circuit voltage
40.05 V
40.45 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
33.71 V
34.11 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
14.10 A
14.24 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
13.20 A
13.34 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
Same
Module area
1.998 m²
1.998 m²
Same
Weight
24.5 kg
24.5 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
55.1 kg/kWp
53.8 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
25 yrs
25 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
Back Contact
TOPCon
Back Contact vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
108
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#5,100
vs
#2,714
IBC Module Transparent 455 LS-TA2 leads by 2,386 places
Power density
#5,302
vs
#2,888
IBC Module Transparent 455 LS-TA2 leads by 2,414 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#9,435
vs
#7,897
IBC Module Transparent 455 LS-TA2 leads by 1,538 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,677
vs
#5,669
IBC Module Transparent 455 LS-TA2 leads by 1,008 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
IBC Solar
IBC Solar Transparent 445 LS-TA2 vs IBC Solar Transparent 455 LS-TA2
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
IBC Solar
IBC Solar Transparent 445 LS-TA2 vs IBC Solar IBC Module Transparent 450 LS-TA2
2 differences, the largest is cell technology
Same series, other bin
IBC Solar
IBC Solar Transparent 445 LS-TA2 vs IBC Solar Transparent 450 LS-TA2
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
IBC Solar
IBC Solar Transparent 445 LS-TA2 vs IBC Solar IBC Module Transparent 445 LS-TA2
One difference: cell technology
Same manufacturer
IBC Solar
IBC Solar Transparent 445 LS-TA2 vs IBC Solar YH720W-33MHD/MH
15 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
IBC Solar
IBC Solar Transparent 445 LS-TA2 vs IBC Solar YH715W-33MHD/MH
14 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: IBC Solar Transparent 445 LS-TA2 or IBC Solar IBC Module Transparent 455 LS-TA2?
According to our database: IBC Solar IBC Module Transparent 455 LS-TA2 has higher module efficiency (22.80% vs 22.30%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of IBC Solar Transparent 445 LS-TA2 and IBC Solar IBC Module Transparent 455 LS-TA2?
IBC Solar Transparent 445 LS-TA2 has a module efficiency of 22.30%, while IBC Solar IBC Module Transparent 455 LS-TA2 is 22.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does IBC Solar Transparent 445 LS-TA2 use vs IBC Solar IBC Module Transparent 455 LS-TA2?
IBC Solar Transparent 445 LS-TA2 uses Back Contact cells; IBC Solar IBC Module Transparent 455 LS-TA2 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on IBC Solar Transparent 445 LS-TA2 and IBC Solar IBC Module Transparent 455 LS-TA2?
IBC Solar Transparent 445 LS-TA2 has a 30 years power warranty; IBC Solar IBC Module Transparent 455 LS-TA2 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are IBC Solar Transparent 445 LS-TA2 and IBC Solar IBC Module Transparent 455 LS-TA2 bifacial panels?
Both IBC Solar Transparent 445 LS-TA2 and IBC Solar IBC Module Transparent 455 LS-TA2 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 2 IBC Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.