Skip to main content
HiT-H455CE-BF vs JAM54D40-470/LR 6 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF vs JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR

Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF
HiT-H455CE-BF
455 Wp 22.80 % HJT Bifacial Incomplete
VS
JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR
JAM54D40-470/LR
470 Wp 23.50 % N-type
The verdict

12 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.050 %/°C better in heat. 6 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 12 differences
How alike are they
6 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

12 of 18 parameters
Parameter HiT-H455CE-BF JAM54D40-470/LR Difference
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.290 %/°C 0.050 %/°C better in heat
Module efficiency 22.80 % 23.50 % 0.70 pp more efficient
Product warranty 30 yrs 15 yrs 15 yrs longer
Power density 227.7 Wp/m² 235.2 Wp/m² 7.5 Wp/m² higher
Open-circuit voltage 36.82 V 40.40 V 3.58 V apart
Rated power 455 Wp 470 Wp 15 W more power
Cell technology HJT N-type HJT vs N-type
Cell count 96 108 12 cells apart
Short-circuit current 15.64 A 14.66 A 0.98 A apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Voltage at max power 30.94 V 33.84 V 2.90 V apart
Current at max power 14.71 A 13.89 A 0.82 A apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
HiT-H455CE-BF
15,266 kWh
JAM54D40-470/LR
15,769 kWh
Lifetime gap
503 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario HiT-H455CE-BF JAM54D40-470/LR
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 455 W 470 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 439 W 450 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 422 W 429 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 406 W 409 W
03

Full specification

Parameter HiT-H455CE-BF JAM54D40-470/LR Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 455 Wp 470 Wp +15 W for JAM54D40-470/LR
Module efficiency 22.80 % 23.50 % +0.70 pp for JAM54D40-470/LR
Power density 227.7 Wp/m² 235.2 Wp/m² +7.5 Wp/m² for JAM54D40-470/LR
Open-circuit voltage 36.82 V 40.40 V 3.58 V apart
Voltage at max power 30.94 V 33.84 V 2.90 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.64 A 14.66 A 0.98 A apart
Current at max power 14.71 A 13.89 A 0.82 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.290 %/°C +0.050 %/°C for HiT-H455CE-BF
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 1.998 m² 1.998 m² Same
Weight 21.8 kg 22.0 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 47.9 kg/kWp 46.8 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 15 yrs +15 yrs for HiT-H455CE-BF
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - 0.40 %/yr Not published by Hyundai
Technology
Cell technology HJT N-type HJT vs N-type
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 96 108 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#2,714 vs #716
JAM54D40-470/LR leads by 1,998 places
Power density
#2,888 vs #674
JAM54D40-470/LR leads by 2,214 places
Heat behaviour
#13 vs #2,165
HiT-H455CE-BF leads by 2,152 places
Weight
#1,971 vs #1,356
JAM54D40-470/LR leads by 615 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,609 vs #6,332
HiT-H455CE-BF leads by 1,723 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF vs Hyundai HiT-H460CE-BF
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF vs Hyundai HiT-H450CE-BF
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF vs Hyundai HiT-H445CE-BF
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF vs Hyundai HiT-H440CE-BF
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR vs JA Solar JAM54D40-475/LR
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR vs JA Solar JAM54D40-465/LR
One difference: module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF or JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR?
According to our database: JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 22.80%); Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF and JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR?
Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF has a module efficiency of 22.80%, while JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR is 23.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF use vs JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR?
Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF uses HJT cells; JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF and JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR?
Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF has a 30 years power warranty; JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF and JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR bifacial panels?
Hyundai HiT-H455CE-BF is bifacial (captures light from both faces); JA Solar JAM54D40-470/LR is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Compare Hyundai and JA Solar as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 40 Hyundai offers · See 381 JA Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.