Hyundai HiN-T435NF(BK) vs Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)
VS
The verdict
HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.12 pp more efficient. 4 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 15 differencesHow alike are they
4
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
15 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
HiN-T435NF(BK)
HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)
Difference
Module efficiency
22.28 %
23.40 %
1.12 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.240 %/°C
0.060 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
435 Wp
520 Wp
85 W more power
Power density
222.8 Wp/m²
234.0 Wp/m²
11.2 Wp/m² higher
Product warranty
25 yrs
30 yrs
5 yrs longer
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.30 %/yr
0.10 %/yr slower
Module area
1.953 m²
2.223 m²
0.270 m² apart
Weight
24.5 kg
27.1 kg
2.6 kg lighter
Short-circuit current
14.32 A
15.92 A
1.60 A apart
Weight per kWp
56.3 kg/kWp
52.1 kg/kWp
4.2 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage
38.60 V
41.20 V
2.60 V apart
Cell technology
TOPCon
HJT
TOPCon vs HJT
Current at max power
13.56 A
15.04 A
1.48 A apart
Voltage at max power
32.10 V
34.60 V
2.50 V apart
Dimensions
1722x1134x30 mm
1960x1134x30 mm
1722x1134x30 mm vs 1960x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
HiN-T435NF(BK)
14,595 kWh
HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)
17,718 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,123 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
HiN-T435NF(BK)
HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
435 W
520 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
415 W
501 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
396 W
483 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
376 W
464 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
HiN-T435NF(BK)
HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
435 Wp
520 Wp
+85 W for HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)
Module efficiency
22.28 %
23.40 %
+1.12 pp for HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)
Power density
222.8 Wp/m²
234.0 Wp/m²
+11.2 Wp/m² for HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)
Open-circuit voltage
38.60 V
41.20 V
2.60 V apart
Voltage at max power
32.10 V
34.60 V
2.50 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.32 A
15.92 A
1.60 A apart
Current at max power
13.56 A
15.04 A
1.48 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.240 %/°C
+0.060 %/°C for HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)
Mechanical
Dimensions
1722x1134x30 mm
1960x1134x30 mm
1722x1134x30 mm vs 1960x1134x30 mm
Module area
1.953 m²
2.223 m²
0.270 m² apart
Weight
24.5 kg
27.1 kg
-2.6 kg for HiN-T435NF(BK)
Weight per kWp
56.3 kg/kWp
52.1 kg/kWp
-4.2 kg/kWp for HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
25 yrs
30 yrs
+5 yrs for HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.30 %/yr
-0.10 %/yr for HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
HJT
TOPCon vs HJT
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
108
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#5,403
vs
#882
HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) leads by 4,521 places
Power density
#5,150
vs
#898
HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) leads by 4,252 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093
vs
#13
HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) leads by 6,080 places
Weight
#10,568
vs
#5,593
HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) leads by 4,975 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#7,120
vs
#1,953
HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) leads by 5,167 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Hyundai HiN-T435NF(BK) vs Hyundai HiN-T440NF(BK)
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hyundai HiN-T435NF(BK) vs Hyundai HiN-T430NF(BK)
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) vs Hyundai HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) vs Hyundai HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) vs Hyundai HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) vs Hyundai HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Hyundai HiN-T435NF(BK) or Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)?
According to our database: Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) has higher module efficiency (23.40% vs 22.28%); Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Hyundai HiN-T435NF(BK) and Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)?
Hyundai HiN-T435NF(BK) has a module efficiency of 22.28%, while Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) is 23.40%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Hyundai HiN-T435NF(BK) use vs Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)?
Hyundai HiN-T435NF(BK) uses TOPCon cells; Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Hyundai HiN-T435NF(BK) and Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)?
Hyundai HiN-T435NF(BK) has a 30 years power warranty; Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Hyundai HiN-T435NF(BK) and Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) bifacial panels?
Both Hyundai HiN-T435NF(BK) and Hyundai HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB) are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 42 Hyundai offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.