Skip to main content
450W vs 460W 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 450W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 460W

HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 450W
HT-SAAE
HT54-18X(ND)-F 450W
450 Wp 22.50 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 460W
HT-SAAE
HT54-18X(ND)-F 460W
460 Wp 23.00 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

460W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.50 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter 450W 460W Difference
Module efficiency 22.50 % 23.00 % 0.50 pp more efficient
Power density 225.2 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² 5.0 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 450 Wp 460 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.310 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
450W
15,098 kWh
460W
15,434 kWh
Lifetime gap
336 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 450W 460W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 450 W 460 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.3% of rated power 429 W 439 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 90.7% of rated power 408 W 417 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.0% of rated power 387 W 396 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 450W 460W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 450 Wp 460 Wp +10 W for 460W
Module efficiency 22.50 % 23.00 % +0.50 pp for 460W
Power density 225.2 Wp/m² 230.2 Wp/m² +5.0 Wp/m² for 460W
Open-circuit voltage 38.80 V 39.40 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 32.50 V 32.90 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.55 A 14.67 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.85 A 13.99 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.310 %/°C -0.310 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 1.998 m² 1.998 m² Same
Weight 25.0 kg 25.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 55.6 kg/kWp 54.3 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#4,222 vs #1,919
460W leads by 2,303 places
Power density
#4,225 vs #1,876
460W leads by 2,349 places
Heat behaviour
#8,005 vs #8,005
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#9,909 vs #8,637
460W leads by 1,272 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,211 vs #4,320
460W leads by 891 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 450W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 455W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 450W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 445W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 450W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 440W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 450W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 435W
5 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 450W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 430W
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 450W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 425W
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 450W or HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 460W?
According to our database: HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 460 W has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 22.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 450W and HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 460W?
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 450 W has a module efficiency of 22.50%, while HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 460 W is 23.00%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 450W use vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 460W?
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 450 W uses TOPCon cells; HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 460 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 450W and HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 460W?
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 450 W has a 30 years power warranty; HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 460 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 450W and HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 460W bifacial panels?
Both HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 450 W and HT-SAAE HT54-18X(ND)-F 460 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.