Skip to main content
500W vs 510W 13 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-510W

HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500W
HT-SAAE
HT54-18X(N)-500W
500 Wp 22.50 % TOPCon
VS
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-510W
HT-SAAE
HT54-18X(N)-510W
510 Wp 22.90 % TOPCon
The verdict

510W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.40 pp more efficient. 13 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 6 differences
How alike are they
13 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

6 of 19 parameters
Parameter 500W 510W Difference
Module efficiency 22.50 % 22.90 % 0.40 pp more efficient
Power density 225.0 Wp/m² 229.5 Wp/m² 4.5 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 500 Wp 510 Wp 10 W more power
Short-circuit current 15.62 A 16.15 A 0.53 A apart
Current at max power 14.77 A 15.51 A 0.74 A apart
Voltage at max power 33.90 V 32.90 V 1.00 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.310 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
500W
16,776 kWh
510W
17,112 kWh
Lifetime gap
336 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 500W 510W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 500 W 510 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.3% of rated power 477 W 486 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 90.7% of rated power 454 W 463 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.0% of rated power 430 W 439 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 500W 510W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 500 Wp 510 Wp +10 W for 510W
Module efficiency 22.50 % 22.90 % +0.40 pp for 510W
Power density 225.0 Wp/m² 229.5 Wp/m² +4.5 Wp/m² for 510W
Open-circuit voltage 40.10 V 39.70 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 33.90 V 32.90 V 1.00 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.62 A 16.15 A 0.53 A apart
Current at max power 14.77 A 15.51 A 0.74 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.310 %/°C -0.310 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1960x1134x30 mm 1960x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.223 m² 2.223 m² Same
Weight 23.5 kg 23.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 47.0 kg/kWp 46.1 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#4,281 vs #2,412
510W leads by 1,869 places
Power density
#4,510 vs #2,369
510W leads by 2,141 places
Heat behaviour
#8,069 vs #8,069
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#1,450 vs #979
510W leads by 471 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,428 vs #2,603
510W leads by 825 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-520W
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-515W
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-505W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-475W
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-470W
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-465W
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500W or HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-510W?
According to our database: HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-510 W has higher module efficiency (22.90% vs 22.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500W and HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-510W?
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500 W has a module efficiency of 22.50%, while HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-510 W is 22.90%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500W use vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-510W?
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500 W uses TOPCon cells; HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-510 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500W and HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-510W?
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500 W has a 30 years power warranty; HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-510 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.