Skip to main content
500W vs 475W 10 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-475W

HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500W
HT-SAAE
HT54-18X(N)-500W
500 Wp 22.50 % TOPCon
VS
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-475W
HT-SAAE
HT54-18X(N)-475W
475 Wp 23.80 % TOPCon
The verdict

475W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.30 pp more efficient. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 9 differences
How alike are they
10 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

9 of 19 parameters
Parameter 500W 475W Difference
Module efficiency 22.50 % 23.80 % 1.30 pp more efficient
Power density 225.0 Wp/m² 237.7 Wp/m² 12.8 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 500 Wp 475 Wp 25 W more power
Module area 2.223 m² 1.998 m² 0.225 m² apart
Weight 23.5 kg 21.0 kg 2.5 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 47.0 kg/kWp 44.2 kg/kWp 2.8 kg/kWp lighter
Short-circuit current 15.62 A 14.85 A 0.77 A apart
Dimensions 1960x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 1960x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Current at max power 14.77 A 14.20 A 0.57 A apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.310 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
500W
16,776 kWh
475W
15,937 kWh
Lifetime gap
839 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 500W 475W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 500 W 475 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.3% of rated power 477 W 453 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 90.7% of rated power 454 W 431 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.0% of rated power 430 W 409 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 500W 475W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 500 Wp 475 Wp +25 W for 500W
Module efficiency 22.50 % 23.80 % +1.30 pp for 475W
Power density 225.0 Wp/m² 237.7 Wp/m² +12.8 Wp/m² for 475W
Open-circuit voltage 40.10 V 40.00 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 33.90 V 33.50 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 15.62 A 14.85 A 0.77 A apart
Current at max power 14.77 A 14.20 A 0.57 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.310 %/°C -0.310 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1960x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 1960x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.223 m² 1.998 m² 0.225 m² apart
Weight 23.5 kg 21.0 kg -2.5 kg for 475W
Weight per kWp 47.0 kg/kWp 44.2 kg/kWp -2.8 kg/kWp for 475W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial No No Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#4,281 vs #462
475W leads by 3,819 places
Power density
#4,510 vs #497
475W leads by 4,013 places
Heat behaviour
#8,069 vs #8,069
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#1,450 vs #396
475W leads by 1,054 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,428 vs #2,711
475W leads by 717 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-520W
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-515W
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-510W
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-505W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-470W
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-465W
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500W or HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-475W?
According to our database: HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-475 W has higher module efficiency (23.80% vs 22.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500W and HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-475W?
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500 W has a module efficiency of 22.50%, while HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-475 W is 23.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500W use vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-475W?
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500 W uses TOPCon cells; HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-475 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500W and HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-475W?
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500 W has a 30 years power warranty; HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-475 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.