HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-470W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-515W
VS
The verdict
8 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is rated power: 45 W more power. 11 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 8 differencesHow alike are they
11
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
8 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
470W
515W
Difference
Rated power
470 Wp
515 Wp
45 W more power
Module area
1.998 m²
2.223 m²
0.225 m² apart
Module efficiency
23.50 %
23.20 %
0.30 pp more efficient
Weight
21.0 kg
23.5 kg
2.5 kg lighter
Short-circuit current
14.79 A
16.20 A
1.41 A apart
Power density
235.2 Wp/m²
231.7 Wp/m²
3.5 Wp/m² higher
Current at max power
14.13 A
15.57 A
1.44 A apart
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
1960x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 1960x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.310 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
470W
15,769 kWh
515W
17,279 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,510 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
470W
515W
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
470 W
515 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.3% of rated power
448 W
491 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
90.7% of rated power
426 W
467 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.0% of rated power
404 W
443 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
470W
515W
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
470 Wp
515 Wp
+45 W for 515W
Module efficiency
23.50 %
23.20 %
+0.30 pp for 470W
Power density
235.2 Wp/m²
231.7 Wp/m²
+3.5 Wp/m² for 470W
Open-circuit voltage
39.80 V
39.90 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
33.30 V
33.10 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
14.79 A
16.20 A
1.41 A apart
Current at max power
14.13 A
15.57 A
1.44 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.310 %/°C
-0.310 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
1960x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 1960x1134x30 mm
Module area
1.998 m²
2.223 m²
0.225 m² apart
Weight
21.0 kg
23.5 kg
-2.5 kg for 470W
Weight per kWp
44.7 kg/kWp
45.6 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
108
Same
Bifacial
No
No
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#749
vs
#1,349
470W leads by 600 places
Power density
#707
vs
#1,491
470W leads by 784 places
Heat behaviour
#8,069
vs
#8,069
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#504
vs
#789
470W leads by 285 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,222
vs
#2,176
515W leads by 1,046 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-470W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-520W
6 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-470W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-510W
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-470W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-505W
8 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-470W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-500W
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-470W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-475W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
HT-SAAE
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-470W vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-465W
One difference: module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-470W or HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-515W?
According to our database: HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-470 W has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 23.20%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-470W and HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-515W?
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-470 W has a module efficiency of 23.50%, while HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-515 W is 23.20%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-470W use vs HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-515W?
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-470 W uses TOPCon cells; HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-515 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-470W and HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-515W?
HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-470 W has a 30 years power warranty; HT-SAAE HT54-18X(N)-515 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.
